review-team

review-team is a command for Claude Code from s977043/river-review. It costs 16 tokens per session (2,190 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for running a review team made up of several reviewer roles and combining their findings into one technical-lead report. It can also report how many roles agreed on each finding.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing the current Git diff, selecting reviewer roles, merging duplicate findings, and reporting scope and consensus.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that one reviewer misses an issue and distinguishes problems introduced by the current changes from older issues.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the river-review plugin — 139 skills, 18 commands, 5 agents, 3 hooks shipped together

Good fit Reviewing the current Git diff, selecting reviewer roles, merging duplicate findings, and reporting scope and consensus.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/s977043/river-review/review-team
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s977043/river-review

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install river-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 139 skills, 18 commands, 5 agents, 3 hooks.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-team

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-team

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/s977043/river-review/review-team.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 2,190 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00016 $0.02190
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00876
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00438
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00219

Measured yesterday against content hash ed78e67b74cc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-team scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/review-team.md · 102 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

スキル定義: skills/agent-skills/review-team/SKILL.md

Context

  • Status: git status
  • Recent commits: git log --oneline -10

対象の解決

引数: $ARGUMENTS

引数のうち数字だけのトークンを PR 番号 N、それ以外をロール指定(Step 1)として扱う。対象の差分は次の順で決める。

  1. 引数に PR 番号 N がある場合: gh pr diff N を diff とし、gh pr view N --json headRefOid,files を対象コミットと変更統計とする。ローカルの作業ツリーやブランチの diff は使わない。
  2. 引数に PR 番号が無く、現ブランチに open の PR がある場合(gh pr view --json number,state --jq 'select(.state=="OPEN") | .number' が番号を出力する場合): その PR を対象にし、1 と同じコマンドで取得する。gh pr view は同名ブランチのマージ済み・クローズ済み PR にも一致するため、open 以外は使わない。未コミットの変更(git diff / git diff --cached)があれば、PR の diff に加えてレビューする。
  3. 引数に PR 番号が無く、現ブランチに open の PR が無い場合(上のコマンドが何も出力しないか失敗する場合): git diff <base>...HEAD と未コミットの変更(git diff / git diff --cached)を合わせて diff とする。<base> は origin/<デフォルトブランチ> とし、デフォルトブランチ名は gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef --jq .defaultBranchRef.name で得る。gh repo view が失敗した場合(未認証など)は git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD の出力から origin/ を除いた名前を使う。それも失敗した場合は、対象を決められない旨を出力して終了する。ローカルのブランチは遅れていることがあるため、先に git fetch origin <デフォルトブランチ> を実行する。

どの経路でも diff が空の場合だけ、「差分がありません」と伝えて終了する。

出力の 1 行目に、使った対象を次のいずれかで書く。

  • 対象: PR #N(gh pr diff N / head <headRefOid>)
  • 対象: 現ブランチの PR #N(gh pr diff N / head <headRefOid>)(未コミットの変更を含めた場合は + 未コミットの変更 を付ける)
  • 対象: ローカル diff(git diff <base>...HEAD + 未コミットの変更)

Task

review-team スキルの手順に従い、上で決めた対象の差分をレビュー・チームで検査する。

Step 1: ロールを決定する

引数でロールが指定された場合はそれを使う。なければ auto(差分から自動選択)。

Step 2: レビューを実行する

River Review は npm 未公開のため npx river-review は使えない。エージェントがこのスキルの手順を直接実行する(CLI 不要)。上記 Step 1 で決めたロールを並列に走らせ、Union-Find で finding を統合し、consensusLevel と teamLeadReport を生成する。

リポジトリ内で作業していて river CLI をアクセラレータとして使える場合のみ、次を利用してよい(任意)。--base origin/<デフォルトブランチ> を渡す。コスト確認が必要なら先に --dry-run。

経路 3 では現在の checkout をそのまま対象にする。

# auto モード(推奨)
npm run river -- run . --base origin/<デフォルトブランチ> --reviewers auto --output json

# ロール明示指定
npm run river -- run . --base origin/<デフォルトブランチ> --reviewers <role1,role2,...> --output json

Read the full file on GitHub · 102 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed · +11 lines ed78e67b74cc
  2. 3d ago Changed · +16 lines 5b5656d977f7
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A b2de7ac7f1cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-team is a command published in the GitHub repository s977043/river-review (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,190 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.