Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace/spec-screenshot)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace/spec-screenshot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace/spec-screenshot/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace/spec-screenshot"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace/spec-screenshot.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.04051 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.02025 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00810 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00405 |
Grade A, and why
spec-screenshot scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 580 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Context
- Current directory: !
pwd - Target output: !
test -f SPEC.md && echo "SPEC.md exists (will be overwritten)" || echo "Will create new SPEC.md" - Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- Thinking mode:
!
echo "$ARGUMENTS" | grep -q -i "--deep|deep" && echo "DEEP (sequential thinking enabled)" || echo "STANDARD (regular analysis)"
Your Task
STEP 1: Validate prerequisites
CHECK for images in conversation history:
- SCAN recent messages for screenshots or images
- IF no images found: ERROR "No screenshots detected in conversation. Please paste website screenshots before running this command."
- IF images found: LOG "Found screenshots ready for analysis"
STEP 2: Perform ultra-detailed analysis
DETERMINE thinking mode from arguments:
- IF
$ARGUMENTScontains "deep" or "--deep": USE sequential thinking tool (mcp__sequential-thinking__sequentialthinking) - ELSE (STANDARD mode): Perform regular analysis
Analysis framework - cover ALL of these aspects:
-
Layout Architecture
- Overall page structure (header, navigation, hero, main content, sidebars, footer)
- Grid system and column layouts
- Container widths and max-widths
- Section hierarchy and nesting
-
Typography System
- Font families (identify primary, secondary, monospace)
- Font sizes for each text level (h1-h6, body, small, etc.)
- Font weights used (light, regular, medium, semibold, bold)
- Line heights and letter spacing
- Text colors and contrast ratios
-
Color Palette
- Primary brand colors
- Secondary/accent colors
- Background colors (main, sections, cards)
- Text colors (headings, body, muted, links)
- Border colors
- State colors (success, error, warning, info)
- Color codes in hex/rgb (best approximation)
-
Spacing System
- Margins between major sections
- Padding within components
- Gap spacing in flex/grid layouts
- Consistent spacing scale (e.g., 4px, 8px, 16px, 24px, 32px)
- Vertical rhythm patterns
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 580 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 0d2224bf742d
spec-screenshot is a command published in the GitHub repository sablier-labs/plugin-marketplace (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 4,051 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
seed-create-component
A command for creating a new SEED Design component, including its source specification, recipes, React implementation, documentation, examples, and optional headless layer.
sddesign
Full spec-driven pipeline — walks brief → tokens → shape (spec) → craft (build) → converge → ship in one guided run. Writes .ui-craft/spec.md. Run when starting a net-new surface from scratch.
craft
One-shot build pipeline for a complete surface from an outcome recipe — inputs (or defaults) → composition → theme → build order → acceptance bar. Use when the user asks for a whole surface ("build me a dashboard", "I need a landing page") and expects a shippable result, not component-level help.
ui-flow-review
Review menus, HUD, navigation, and player flow from a UX perspective.
responsive-design-specialist
Use when a layout breaks between sizes. Arbitrary breakpoints, type that does not scale, images that blow out the grid, or a desktop design retrofitted onto mobile.
revisar-ui
Auditoria visual retroativa de 6 pilares do código frontend implementado.