Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Sagargupta16/claude-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sagargupta16/claude-skills/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00338 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Live state
- Branch: !
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD - Base detection: !
git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || echo "no main base found" - Changed files: !
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null)...HEAD --stat - Full diff: !
git diff $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null)...HEAD
Task
Review the diff above for quality, bugs, and best practices.
Per changed file, look for:
- Logic errors, off-by-one, null handling, race conditions
- Security: injection (SQL/XSS/command), hardcoded secrets, missing input validation, insecure deserialization
- Performance: N+1 queries, unbounded loops, missing indexes, memory leaks
- Error handling at boundaries; silent exception swallowing
- Hardcoded values that should be configurable
- Breaking changes to public APIs
Check test coverage: are new functions or branches tested?
Output
SUMMARY: <ship-it | needs-changes | major-issues>
[SEVERITY] file:line -- description
Fix: <one-line suggestion>
Severity: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW | STYLE. Report only real findings; say "no issues" if the diff is clean.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed a1b6fbff2cba
- 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 74dfb1508d50
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Sagargupta16/claude-skills (5 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 338 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-arch
Review app architecture: components, data flows, risks, and prioritized improvements.
speckit.analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
ts-review
Run a full TypeScript code review against project conventions.
commit
Create a git commit with intelligent message drafting (-f for fast, -v for verbose).
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
simplify
The over-engineering review: five tags (delete, stdlib, native, yagni, shrink), a mandatory replacement per finding, and a real null result when there is nothing to cut.