Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/review-arch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/review-arch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/review-arch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/review-arch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins/review-arch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00633 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
Grade C, and why
review-arch scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reaches for credential fileshighPrivilege escalation
SSH keys, cloud credentials, git-credentials, .npmrc, /etc/shadow: reading these is how a config file becomes a credential leak.
- **Security exclusion**: NEVER read or display contents of secrets files (.env, .env.*, *.key, *.pem, credentials.json, .aws/credentials, etc.) The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan C 31eeaa02f724
review-arch is a command published in the GitHub repository shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 633 tokens. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (reaches for credential files). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
check-pr
Check a PR's CI status, reviews, comments, and merge readiness.
review
Review the current branch's changes for quality, bugs, and best practices.
refactor
Identify code smells and apply safe refactoring with tests verification.
todo
The quality-gated task list: tasks with real descriptions, testable acceptance criteria, and evidence — a task only closes when the controller agrees it is done.
milestone-review
PitWay: Role-based milestone review workflow (start/brief/record/report/decide).
ask
Ask a single expert agent a question - like a Slack ping to a colleague.