Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sandeep-alluru/polaroid. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/main/.claude/commands/test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandeep-alluru/polaroidWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sandeep-alluru/polaroid/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to test — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run the full test suite with coverage and report results.
Steps:
- Run:
make test(equivalent to:pytest tests/ --cov=<name> --cov-report=term-missing) - Report:
- Total tests, passed, failed, skipped
- Coverage percentage — flag if below 85%
- Any failing tests: show the test name, error message, and the relevant source line
- If any tests fail, diagnose the root cause before suggesting a fix:
- Is it a logic error in the implementation?
- Is it a test that needs updating due to an intentional behavior change?
- Is it a missing edge case?
- Do NOT suggest disabling or skipping tests to make the suite pass.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 737c346e7e7c
test is a command published in the GitHub repository sandeep-alluru/polaroid (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 157 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to test, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
test-browser
Run browser tests on pages affected by current PR or branch.
starlight-eval
Run a Starlight Proving Ground pass — evaluate the whole Starlight Intelligence System across eight lanes, render per-lane and system verdicts with the Luminor kernel mindset, and write a scorecard receipt.
bugfix
TDD-driven bugfix workflow: tester writes failing test (RED) → developer fixes (GREEN) → developer refactors (REFACTOR) → reviewer validates. Accepts issue number, description, or both. Asks before pushing and creating a PR; --no-pr commits locally without asking.
develop
Implement skill development issues with TDD-governed workflow.
spec
Spec-driven development — brainstorm, plan, review, and execute with quality gates and approval.
qa
Composer QA — list, show and run the test and suite blocks of .mdl specs against a live app; snapshot it.