Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sandeep-alluru/worldoracle. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/main/.claude/commands/pr-prep.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sandeep-alluru/worldoracleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/pr-prep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/pr-prep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/pr-prep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/pr-prep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sandeep-alluru/worldoracle/pr-prep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00184 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
pr-prep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pr-prep — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Run the full pre-PR checklist and report what's ready and what needs fixing.
Steps:
- Run lint:
make lint(ruff check + ruff format --check) - Run type check:
make typecheck(mypy) - Run tests:
make test(pytest with coverage) - Check CHANGELOG.md has an entry under [Unreleased] for this change
- Check that no debug print() statements or TODO comments were left in modified files
Report in this format: ✅ Lint — clean ✅ Types — clean ✅ Tests — 43 passed, 87% coverage ⚠️ CHANGELOG — no [Unreleased] entry found ✅ No debug artifacts
If anything fails, show the exact error and the file:line to fix. Do not mark the PR ready until all 5 checks pass.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bdaef57ccde0
pr-prep is a command published in the GitHub repository sandeep-alluru/worldoracle (0 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 184 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pr-prep, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with benefit-based placement, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.
AGENTS
Run the current binary in a temporary test repository with a real PTY. Use tmux-cli when available, capture terminal output, and inspect -vv logs when behavior depends on timing or shell state. Avoid treating a piped command as proof of interactive behavior.
implement
Execute all implementation tasks from tasks.md with test-driven development, parallel batching, and atomic commits.
pr-ready
Run the project's pre-commit review loop to determine whether the current branch is ready to push — lint, tests, parallel pr-review-toolkit agents plus an over-engineering audit, fix-and-re-run until convergence.
git-workflow
Run review, tests, and commit steps, then prepare a pull request.
check-fix
Execute quality gates, fix any issues found, and create a single high-quality Conventional Commit summarizing all changes made.