thoth:discuss

A command for discussing or recording project-planning decisions without starting implementation. Planning decisions are choices about what to build and how to approach it.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to discuss plans or record decisions in a Thoth-managed project.
Why use it?
It keeps planning separate from execution, reducing the risk of changing code before the work is agreed.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/seeleai/thoth/discuss
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SeeleAI/Thoth
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 839 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00839
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00419
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00168
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00084

Measured 2d ago against content hash df402b16281e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

thoth:discuss scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/discuss.md · 73 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/thoth:discuss

Generated Surface

This file is generated from thoth.command_specs.COMMAND_SPECS. Do not hand edit.

Real Runtime Execution

The repo-local Thoth runtime command for this slash command has already been executed before Claude sees this prompt.

THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_FILE="$(mktemp -t thoth-discuss-arguments.XXXXXX)"
trap 'rm -f "$THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_FILE"' EXIT
cat > "$THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_FILE" <<'THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_EOF'
$ARGUMENTS
THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_EOF
"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/thoth-claude-command.sh" discuss --thoth-arguments-file "$THOTH_DISCUSS_ARGUMENTS_FILE"

Response Contract

  • Treat the structured bridge payload above as the only authority for this command invocation.
  • If bridge_success is false, report the exact bridge failure and stop.
  • If run or loop is missing --work-id, show returned candidates and stop; do not invent, create, compile, or guess a work item.
  • If bridge_success is true and runtime events are present, summarize progress, terminal status, and risk from those events only.
  • Do not hand-edit .thoth or manually call runtime protocol commands; the Thoth RuntimeDriver advances phases.
  • If packet.dispatch_mode is external_worker, do not duplicate the work locally; report the run id, worker mode, and the correct follow-up only.
  • If you only describe what should happen next instead of reporting the executed runtime result, treat that as failure.
  • Use AskUserQuestion until compact authority categories are explicit: goal, constraints, decisions, risks, approach_notes, and open_questions.
  • On major semantic changes, write a draft authority checkpoint through packet.protocol_commands.checkpoint_authority.
  • When no material assumptions remain, close with the compact authority categories plus packet.work_json_template or packet.work_graph_schema through packet.protocol_commands.close_authority.
  • Use packet.init_project_patch_schema only for init discussions; ordinary discussions cannot patch project name, description, or directions.
  • When closing authority for an existing work item, preserve its stable work_id; do not omit work_id and create a timestamp work item.
  • Do not create ready work if any open_questions remain in the authority capsule.

Read the full file on GitHub · 73 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 73 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A df402b16281e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

thoth:discuss is a command published in the GitHub repository SeeleAI/Thoth (51 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 839 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.