Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add sigistry/marketplace/plugin install recordsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sigistry/marketplace/derive-quality-rules)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sigistry/marketplace/derive-quality-rules"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sigistry/marketplace/derive-quality-rules.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00226 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00113 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
derive-quality-rules scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Derive FHIR Quality Rules
Use the fhir-ci-quality skill and read skills/fhir-validation/references/quality-rules.md.
Target: $ARGUMENTS or directories reported by the detector.
When a local directory is available, prefer:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/fhir-validation/scripts/derive-quality-rules.mjs" "$ARGUMENTS"
Derive proposed, reviewable quality rules from local evidence:
- Sample resources by type, profile, and directory.
- Identify repeated local conventions for
meta.profile, identifiers, references, extensions, Bundle shape, and completeness. - Mark every rule as proposed policy, not authoritative clinical truth.
- Identify reviewer type: technical, domain, terminology, privacy, or security.
- Suggest CI fit: Records CLI, Records API, existing script, or manual review.
Do not infer clinical coding policy, status values, or business rules from one example.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 27 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A ba69859ddba4
derive-quality-rules is a command published in the GitHub repository sigistry/marketplace (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 226 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
validate
Mechanically validate the sonu plugin repo before a PR — manifest sync, YAML frontmatter, shell-fence syntax, named-source and AI-attribution scans, cross-reference integrity, skill reachability. Only meaningful inside the claude-plugins repo; in any other repo, say so and stop.
f5-gate
Quality gate management with evidence collection.
_test-shared
Shared testing patterns and templates (internal).
engineer
Guided full-project lifecycle - walks intake → plan (sign-off) → autonomous build → quality gates → CI/finish, invoking the right claude-engineer skill at each stage.
check-01-happy
Le wiki est dans un état sain : toutes les pages ont un frontmatter valide, les liens [[wikilinks]] pointent vers des pages existantes, index.md est à jour et aucune page n'est orpheline. La commande /check doit produire un rapport propre et mettre à jour wiki/log.md. Elle ne doit rien modifier dans le wiki au-delà du…
check-02-edge-stale-links
Le wiki contient des liens brisés (une page référence une autre qui a été renommée ou n'existe pas encore) et une page dont le champ lastupdated date de plus de 6 mois sans source récente correspondante. Le comportement attendu est que le librarian détecte et signale ces anomalies dans un rapport clair, sans les…