Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/skullninja/coco-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/skullninja/coco-workflow/planning-triage)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skullninja/coco-workflow/planning-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skullninja/coco-workflow/planning-triage/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/skullninja/coco-workflow/planning-triage"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/skullninja/coco-workflow/planning-triage.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00577 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00231 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00058 |
Grade A, and why
planning-triage scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Planning Triage
Quick-score an item and determine its disposition.
Input
$ARGUMENTS
The item to triage (bug report, feature request, user feedback, competitor feature).
Process
1. Understand the Item
Parse the input to identify:
- Type: Bug, Feature, Enhancement, Competitive Response
- Description: What is being requested or reported
- Context: Why it matters (user impact, competitive pressure, etc.)
2. Score
Apply the impact-first scoring framework:
Score = (Impact + Urgency) / Effort
| Factor | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact | No effect on users | Minor convenience | Moderate engagement | Significant daily value | Critical for adoption/retention |
| Urgency | Someday/nice-to-have | Next quarter | This month | This week | Today/blocking |
| Effort | Multi-week project | ~1 week | ~2-3 days | ~hours | ~minutes |
3. Rate Each Factor
For each factor, provide the score (1-5) and brief justification.
4. Calculate and Interpret
Score = (Impact + Urgency) / Effort
>= 3.0 -> IMMEDIATE ACTION
1.5-3.0 -> BACKLOG
< 1.5 -> DEFER
5. Disposition
If IMMEDIATE (>= 3.0):
- Create issue with High/Urgent priority (based on issue_tracker.provider in config)
- If feature: recommend
/coco:planning-session tactical - If bug: recommend creating hotfix branch
If BACKLOG (1.5-3.0):
- Create issue with Normal priority
- Tag for next operational planning session
If DEFER (< 1.5):
- Document the rationale
- Do NOT create an issue
- Note for quarterly strategic review
6. Output
## Triage: {item title}
**Type:** {Bug/Feature/Enhancement}
**Score:** {X.X}
| Factor | Score | Rationale |
|--------|-------|-----------|
| Impact | {N} | {reason} |
| Urgency | {N} | {reason} |
| Effort | {N} | {reason} |
**Disposition:** {IMMEDIATE / BACKLOG / DEFER}
**Action:** {what was done}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 87 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 6fc49fcf2931
planning-triage is a command published in the GitHub repository skullninja/coco-workflow (8 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 577 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ccc
CC Commander Hub — interactive menu derived from adventure JSON files. 450+ skills, 11 CCC domains, 80+ commands, 9 modes.
ccc-spawn
Plan and launch parallel Claude Code peers (quick, team, swarm or domain expert), each on its own branch and worktree with non-overlapping files, then track or stop them. Use when work splits into independent parts that should run in separate sessions.
ccc-improve
Run the continuous-improvement pipeline: scan GitHub and npm for new Claude Code tooling, score proposals, and approve or reject them in a local queue. Use when reviewing ecosystem findings or deciding what to adopt next.
ccc-linear
Show the Linear project board by status with a progress bar, pick an issue to start work on, or create a new issue, with every Linear write confirmed first. Use when you want to see or act on your Linear project from the session or the ccc CLI.
ccc-improve-commands
Audit the slash command library: inventory every command, grade quality, find missing categories, and apply approved updates, additions, and archivals. Use when the command library feels stale, duplicated, or incomplete.
ccc-makeover
Score project health with X-Ray, apply the top recommendations in impact order with your OK for each, and show the before and after score. Use when you want the highest-impact project health fixes applied and measured.