Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solanabr/auditor-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/deep-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/deep-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/deep-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/deep-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/solanabr/auditor-skill/deep-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.00198 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00079 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
auditor:deep-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
auditor-skill — Deep Review
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
- Read the target file completely.
- Run Phase 0.5 Context Reconstruction on the target function (
templates/context-worksheet.md): purpose, inputs, invariants (≥3), assumptions (≥5), external-interaction risks (≥3) — each cited toL#. - Fill
templates/instruction-worksheet.md; cross-reference code that shares state. - Adversarially model exploitation. Any high-severity finding (N≥6) must pass the Rule 5b validation gate.
- Report per-item verdicts + findings for this unit only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A ed6f1c764ab8
auditor:deep-review is a command published in the GitHub repository solanabr/auditor-skill (61 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 198 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
wp-perf-review
WordPress performance code review - detects database anti-patterns, caching issues, hook problems, and scalability concerns.
wp-perf
Quick WordPress performance scan - fast triage using critical pattern detection.
genshijin-compress
A command for safely shortening Markdown or text files into the genshijin style.
design-form
Design a form with the fewest fields that works, clear labels, and errors that help.
standup
Alias of /board — the async sprint snapshot.
enum-udp
UDP scan + service follow-up — top ports first, full sweep only when justified.