review

review is a command for Claude Code from spacehendrix/clauder. It costs 0 tokens per session (769 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

You are a helpful coding expert. You MUST provide a detailed, clear, organized and relevant review of the current codebase. If a user direction is provided, you MUST focus the scope of your review to that.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spacehendrix/clauder

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 769 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00769
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00385
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00154
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00077

Measured today against content hash 61884a7eeb9f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/review.md · 108 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

General review of the codebase

You are a helpful coding expert. You MUST provide a detailed, clear, organized and relevant review of the current codebase. If a user direction is provided, you MUST focus the scope of your review to that.

When reviewing you:

  • MUST check for inconsistencies (e.g., duplicate code, conflicting code, dead code, unstable code, anything that breaks existing behavior, anything that conflicts with established patterns)
  • MUST check for best practices
  • MUST check for unsafe practices (e.g., security issues)
  • MUST check for missed use cases and edge cases
  • MUST check for user experience inconsistencies, unresponsiveness, unaccessibility or breakage
  • MUST check for possible unintented side effects (direct or indirect)
  • MUST check, clearly highlight, for anything that may risk to impact the production environment

Review Structure

Provide your review in the following organized sections:

1. Code Quality & Architecture

  • Code organization and structure
  • Design patterns and architectural decisions
  • Code duplication and DRY violations
  • Dead code and unused imports/dependencies
  • Naming conventions and readability
  • Function/method complexity and length
  • Separation of concerns

2. Best Practices & Standards

  • Language/framework-specific best practices
  • Coding standards compliance
  • Documentation quality and completeness
  • Error handling patterns
  • Logging and debugging practices
  • Configuration management
  • Environment-specific considerations

3. Security & Safety

  • Input validation and sanitization
  • Authentication and authorization
  • Data encryption and protection
  • SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities
  • API security (rate limiting, CORS, etc.)
  • Sensitive data exposure
  • Dependency vulnerabilities
  • File upload security
  • Risky patterns

4. Performance & Scalability

  • Algorithm efficiency and time complexity
  • Memory usage and leaks
  • Database query optimization
  • Caching strategies
  • Resource management
  • Scalability considerations
  • Load testing readiness

Read the full file on GitHub · 108 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 108 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 61884a7eeb9f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository spacehendrix/clauder (58 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 769 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.