Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/spacehendrix/clauder/reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spacehendrix/clauderWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/spacehendrix/clauder/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00769 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00385 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
General review of the codebase
You are a helpful coding expert. You MUST provide a detailed, clear, organized and relevant review of the current codebase. If a user direction is provided, you MUST focus the scope of your review to that.
When reviewing you:
- MUST check for inconsistencies (e.g., duplicate code, conflicting code, dead code, unstable code, anything that breaks existing behavior, anything that conflicts with established patterns)
- MUST check for best practices
- MUST check for unsafe practices (e.g., security issues)
- MUST check for missed use cases and edge cases
- MUST check for user experience inconsistencies, unresponsiveness, unaccessibility or breakage
- MUST check for possible unintented side effects (direct or indirect)
- MUST check, clearly highlight, for anything that may risk to impact the production environment
Review Structure
Provide your review in the following organized sections:
1. Code Quality & Architecture
- Code organization and structure
- Design patterns and architectural decisions
- Code duplication and DRY violations
- Dead code and unused imports/dependencies
- Naming conventions and readability
- Function/method complexity and length
- Separation of concerns
2. Best Practices & Standards
- Language/framework-specific best practices
- Coding standards compliance
- Documentation quality and completeness
- Error handling patterns
- Logging and debugging practices
- Configuration management
- Environment-specific considerations
3. Security & Safety
- Input validation and sanitization
- Authentication and authorization
- Data encryption and protection
- SQL injection and XSS vulnerabilities
- API security (rate limiting, CORS, etc.)
- Sensitive data exposure
- Dependency vulnerabilities
- File upload security
- Risky patterns
4. Performance & Scalability
- Algorithm efficiency and time complexity
- Memory usage and leaks
- Database query optimization
- Caching strategies
- Resource management
- Scalability considerations
- Load testing readiness
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 108 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 61884a7eeb9f
review is a command published in the GitHub repository spacehendrix/clauder (58 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 769 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
release-update
(dev-only) release-update maintainer harness — Claude Code upstream change tracker (release-notes version-delta sweep + docs sync). NOT distributed to user projects.
github
(dev-only) github maintainer harness — GitHub issue-fix and PR-review via gh CLI. NOT distributed to user projects.
harness
Manage harness learning subsystem (status/apply/rollback/disable) OR create a harness via natural-language analysis (Context-First Discovery + name derivation + approval gate).
clean
Identify and safely remove dead code with test verification.
goal
Register a completion condition and arm the autonomous continuation loop.
loop
Iteratively fix issues until all resolved or max iterations reached.