Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/meta-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/meta-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/meta-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/meta-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/stefanoskarakasis/product-marketing-skills/meta-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00146 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00058 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
meta-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/pmm-meta:meta-review -- Skill Spec Review
Audit any SKILL.md in this repo against SKILL-SPEC.md, the skill
authoring standard, with a full checklist and prioritized fixes.
Invocation
/pmm-meta:meta-review retro
/pmm-meta:meta-review stakeholder-maps
Workflow
Uses the meta-review skill. Checks the named skill against every spec
requirement, flags what's missing or wrong, and prioritizes fixes by
how much they affect the skill's real-world reliability.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 46fb92f8c3c7
meta-review is a command published in the GitHub repository stefanoskarakasis/Product-Marketing-Skills (8 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 146 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
security-audit-static
Static security audit of AI-built code — map trust boundaries, cross-reference documented intent, self-refute every finding, and report only evidence-backed risks. Scope it to a release's changes with a git range ( .. ) or changes for the uncommitted working tree; audit the whole repository for the first release or…
performance-audit-static
Static performance audit of AI-built code — find N+1 queries and request waterfalls, over-fetching, missing indexes, and caching opportunities, ranked by effort and impact. Scope it to a release's changes with a git range ( .. ) or changes for the uncommitted working tree; audit the whole repository for the first…
ship-check
Turn a vibe-coded repo into a reviewer-ready shipping packet — document the app, wire agent context, run correctness, security and performance reviews, add an independent unsteered pass, map test coverage, and compile the results.
getpix
Find a free licensed image on the internet and add it to the project, optimized.
photo-pass
Art-direction photo pass over the site: add photography only where it earns its place.
diff-review
Generate a visual HTML diff review — before/after architecture comparison with code review analysis.