Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/smk-labs/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/smk-labs/claude-plugins/getpix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/smk-labs/claude-plugins/getpix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/smk-labs/claude-plugins/getpix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/smk-labs/claude-plugins/getpix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/smk-labs/claude-plugins/getpix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00088 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00035 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00018 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
getpix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Use the getpix skill to find, fetch, and insert an image for: $ARGUMENTS
If no arguments were given, ask in one short question what image is needed and where it should go, then proceed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 9 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 79ce2e25c9b3
getpix is a command published in the GitHub repository smk-labs/claude-plugins (11 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 88 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
customer-stories
Run a B2B customer story from kickoff to approval — brief, interview questions, draft, review pack, audit.
value-prop-statements
Fan an existing positioning statement out into segment- and channel-specific value-prop copy.
pmm-metrics
Define a North Star Metric and capped scorecard, or audit an existing metrics list for vanity metrics.
alternatives-map
Build your competitive alternatives map — direct competitors, adjacent tools, DIY, and status quo — from win/loss data.
proof-points
Add, verify, or audit the sourced claims your messaging relies on — then deepen brain Section 6.
product-messaging-playbook
Assemble a Sales/CS-ready messaging playbook — problem, story, competitive comparison, discovery questions, objections.