Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Still-chowline394/MagicTeX-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/still-chowline394/magictex-mcp/add_comment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/still-chowline394/magictex-mcp/add_comment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/still-chowline394/magictex-mcp/add_comment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/still-chowline394/magictex-mcp/add_comment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/still-chowline394/magictex-mcp/add_comment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00113 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00045 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
add_comment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 04257e2a9dd7
add_comment is a command published in the GitHub repository Still-chowline394/MagicTeX-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 113 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ars-plan
ARS academic-paper plan mode — Socratic chapter-by-chapter planning.
ars-revision-coach
ARS academic-paper revision-coach — peer-review roadmap or source-accounted real-committee response skeleton.
init-project-course
Bootstrap a university course or module folder with the canonical teaching structure, guidance, and starter files. Use when creating or migrating a course workspace. Not for checking an existing course without modifying it; use $audit-project-course.
multi-perspective
Explore a research question through several independent analytical perspectives and synthesize their agreements and disagreements. Use when one line of reasoning is insufficient and distinct viewpoints should be preserved.
review-response
Systematic reviewer response workflow: parse comments, classify by severity, develop response strategy, write structured rebuttal. Use when asked to 'write rebuttal', 'respond to reviewers', 'draft review response', or 'handle R&R'.
wiki-grow
Auto-promote eligible project knowledge articles into Research Vault concepts with generated provenance metadata. Use when running the scheduled knowledge-corpus promotion or previewing candidates interactively. Not for consolidating overlapping concepts; use $wiki-merge.