SuperClaude Framework is a configuration framework that organizes Claude Code into a structured development environment with specialized commands, AI agents, behavioral modes, and integrations. It is for developers who want guided workflows covering activities from brainstorming through deployment. The catalogue entries are its commands, agents, skills, instructions, integrations, settings, hooks, and plugin components.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_FrameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_framework/spec-panel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_framework/spec-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_framework/spec-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_framework/spec-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/superclaude-org/superclaude_framework/spec-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.03586 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.01434 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00717 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00359 |
Grade A, and why
spec-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- spec-panel — 98% identical, 36 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 430 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/sc:spec-panel - Expert Specification Review Panel
Triggers
- Specification quality review and improvement requests
- Technical documentation validation and enhancement needs
- Requirements analysis and completeness verification
- Professional specification writing guidance and mentoring
Usage
/sc:spec-panel [specification_content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic] [--experts "name1,name2"] [--focus requirements|architecture|testing|compliance] [--iterations N] [--format standard|structured|detailed]
Behavioral Flow
- Analyze: Parse specification content and identify key components, gaps, and quality issues
- Assemble: Select appropriate expert panel based on specification type and focus area
- Review: Multi-expert analysis using distinct methodologies and quality frameworks
- Collaborate: Expert interaction through discussion, critique, or socratic questioning
- Synthesize: Generate consolidated findings with prioritized recommendations
- Improve: Create enhanced specification incorporating expert feedback and best practices
Key behaviors:
- Multi-expert perspective analysis with distinct methodologies and quality frameworks
- Intelligent expert selection based on specification domain and focus requirements
- Structured review process with evidence-based recommendations and improvement guidance
- Iterative improvement cycles with quality validation and progress tracking
Expert Panel System
Core Specification Experts
Karl Wiegers - Requirements Engineering Pioneer
- Domain: Functional/non-functional requirements, requirement quality frameworks
- Methodology: SMART criteria, testability analysis, stakeholder validation
- Critique Focus: "This requirement lacks measurable acceptance criteria. How would you validate compliance in production?"
Gojko Adzic - Specification by Example Creator
- Domain: Behavior-driven specifications, living documentation, executable requirements
- Methodology: Given/When/Then scenarios, example-driven requirements, collaborative specification
- Critique Focus: "Can you provide concrete examples demonstrating this requirement in real-world scenarios?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines b348ea881172
- 1mo ago First seen · 428 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 02b57ca07a4e
spec-panel is a command published in the GitHub repository SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework (23,905 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 3,586 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
mpm-postmortem
Analyze session errors and suggest improvements.
epistemic
Multi-framework epistemic analysis — compare, suggest, or pick frameworks.
scholastic
Analyze through Modern Scholastic method (quaestio disputata).
analyze-ai-platform
Analyze AI application platform architecture.
analyze-mf-isolation
Analyze microfrontend framework isolation mechanisms.
Icon Design Review
Intelligent design analysis that automatically selects the most relevant legendary design experts for your project and user experience.