Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/swingerman/engineer/atddgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/swingerman/engineerWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00148 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00030 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
atdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Start the Acceptance Test Driven Development workflow.
Invoke the atdd skill to guide the full workflow:
- Understand the feature (use the argument as starting context if provided)
- Write Given/When/Then acceptance specs in
specs/ - Generate/update the test pipeline
- Run specs (expect red)
- Implement with TDD until both test streams pass
- Review specs for implementation leakage
If no feature description was provided as an argument, ask the user what feature they want to build.
User's input: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 21 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 541cdfeea1f0
atdd is a command published in the GitHub repository swingerman/engineer (144 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 148 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
paul:help
Show available PAUL commands and usage guide.
paul:progress
Smart status with routing - suggests ONE next action.
safe-refactor
Safe refactoring with automated review, testing, and rollback capabilities.
test
Smart test runner with filtering, coverage, and health monitoring.
paul:verify
Guide manual user acceptance testing of recently built features.
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — reads the git diff, maps changes to affected pages via the route map, generates a targeted test plan, and executes it via agent-browser (Rust daemon + CDP, ARIA-tree-first) with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, or running regression checks on…