audit-design-debt

audit-design-debt is a command for Claude Code from tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp. It costs 14 tokens per session (281 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that estimates design debt and assigns a design-system maturity level from an image. Design debt is the accumulated cost of inconsistent or duplicated interface decisions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it with a component-inventory image to assess design debt, apply a custom threshold, and evaluate maturity using an optional DESIGN.md file.
Why use it?
It helps show how much of an interface may sit outside shared design rules and whether the system is at an early or advanced stage. You can set a percentage threshold for the assessment.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Part of the design-eval plugin — 5 skills, 5 commands, 4 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it with a component-inventory image to assess design debt, apply a custom threshold, and evaluate maturity using an optional DESIGN.md file.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install design-eval, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 5 skills, 5 commands, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for audit-design-debt

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for audit-design-debt

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp/audit-design-debt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 281 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00281
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00140
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00056
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00028

Measured 13d ago against content hash e364721a0b93, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

audit-design-debt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/design-eval/commands/audit-design-debt.md · 34 lines

What it actually says

/design-eval:audit-design-debt

Calculate design debt and assess design system maturity.

Arguments

Argument Description Example
--imageSource URL, file path, or base64 image to analyze https://example.com/component-inventory.jpg
--threshold Design debt threshold percentage (optional, default: 50%) --threshold 40
--design-system Path to DESIGN.md file for maturity assessment (optional) --design-system ./DESIGN.md

Examples

/design-eval:audit-design-debt --imageSource https://example.com/component-inventory.jpg
/design-eval:audit-design-debt --imageSource ./inventory.png --threshold 40 --design-system ./DESIGN.md

Execution Instructions

Route this request to the design-eval:design-system-maturity-tester subagent. The final user-visible response must be the subagent's output verbatim.

Raw slash-command arguments: $ARGUMENTS

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 34 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A e364721a0b93

Subscribe to this mod's changes

audit-design-debt is a command published in the GitHub repository tan-yong-sheng/ai-vision-mcp (78 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 281 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.