Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to taylorbrook/MAX-MSP_CC_Framework. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/taylorbrook/MAX-MSP_CC_Framework/main/.claude/commands/max-verify.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/taylorbrook/MAX-MSP_CC_FrameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/taylorbrook/max-msp_cc_framework/max-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/taylorbrook/max-msp_cc_framework/max-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/taylorbrook/max-msp_cc_framework/max-verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/taylorbrook/max-msp_cc_framework/max-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/taylorbrook/max-msp_cc_framework/max-verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01665 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00666 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00333 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00167 |
Grade A, and why
max-verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/max-verify
Run the full validation pipeline and critic review on all generated files in the active project.
Behavior
-
Load active project -- read
patches/.active-project.jsonfor the current project. If no active project, prompt the user. -
Find generated files -- scan the project's
generated/directory for all.maxpat,.gendsp, and.jsfiles. -
Run mechanical validation -- for each file:
.maxpatfiles: callvalidate_file()fromsrc.maxpatto check JSON structure, object validity, connection bounds. It passes the file's path, so an unknown object that no abstraction beside the patch (or in its project) resolves is an error, and treats codeboxes as loaded (tab lines warn).js/.gendspfiles: callvalidate_code_file()fromsrc.maxpatfor code-level validation (a.gendspon disk is loaded code: tab lines warn)
-
Run critic review -- invoke the max-critic skill:
- Call
review_patch(patch_dict, code_context)fromsrc.maxpat.critics(defaultis_new=Falsefor committed files; passis_new=Truefor a patch that has never been saved, so an uninitialized control is reported as the blocker the save gate will raise) - Collect all
CriticResultfindings across files
- Call
-
Display results grouped by severity:
- Blockers -- must be fixed before the patch will work correctly. Suggest specific fixes.
- Warnings -- potential issues that may cause unexpected behavior. Annotate with explanation.
- Notes -- informational observations about style or best practices.
-
Update status -- record verification results in project status.
-
Live check (opt-in,
--live) -- only with--live, and only after steps 3-5 have printed the static report:- Run
python3 tools/max_verify_live.py --jsonplus the pass-through flags (--record S,--note P V,--no-shot,--live-inputs). Give no PATH: the tool reads the same active-project pointer and drops the abstractions and bpatcher children that a sibling references, so only top-level patches are loaded. - Exit 0 or 1 -- append a "Live check (MAX 9.2):" section built from the JSON: per patch, the
LIVE BLOCKER/LIVE WARNING/LIVE NOTElines with their suggestions, the shot path and the run dir. Optionally Read each shot PNG to eyeball the layout, and flag visual issues. - Exit 2 -- one line:
live check skipped: <hint>(no bridge, MAX not running, toggle OFF), orlive check aborted: <hint>plus the not-checked patches. The static report and its counts stay exactly as they were. - A file that is not a readable patch (truncated JSON, undecodable bytes, non-patch JSON) is listed as
refusedwith onecannot read <path>: ...note, and the batch goes on. - Live findings are report-only (
.claude/skills/references/severity-contract.mdsection 7): never feed them into the critic revision loop, never change step 6's status record from them, and never auto-fix. Offer/max-iteratefor the fixes.
- Run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +1 lines 6d7cbd032aa0
- 8d ago Changed · +51 lines 23130a96bbbd
- 2mo ago First seen · 67 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 4b5ff2918150
max-verify is a command published in the GitHub repository taylorbrook/MAX-MSP_CC_Framework (46 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,665 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
modernize-transform
Transform one legacy module to the target stack — idiomatic rewrite with behavior-equivalence tests.
constraints
A command for defining a project's quality standards through a short interview and a written CONSTRAINTS.md file. It records checks, thresholds, exceptions, and commands for enforcing them.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.