Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechNickAI/ai-coding-confignpx agentmods add commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fix/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/technickai/ai-coding-config/verify-fix.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00993 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00397 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00199 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
verify-fix scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -s http://localhost:3000/affected-page | head -20 How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 155 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Fix Command
Core principle: A fix isn't fixed until you've seen it work.
- /verify-fix - Verify the most recent fix (infer from context)
- /verify-fix "login redirect works" - Verify specific behavior
- /verify-fix auth tests - Run auth-related tests
Tests exist: Run the relevant test file or test suite.
# TypeScript/JavaScript
pnpm test path/to/affected.test.ts
npm test -- --testPathPattern="ComponentName"
vitest run src/component.test.tsx
# Python
pytest path/to/test_module.py -v
# Go
go test ./pkg/... -run TestAffectedFunction
UI changes: Start dev server and verify visually or fetch the page.
# Verify page loads correctly
curl -s http://localhost:3000/affected-page | head -20
# Or use MCP Playwright tools for visual verification
mcp__plugin_playwright_playwright__browser_navigate to affected URL
mcp__plugin_playwright_playwright__browser_snapshot to capture state
API changes: Hit the endpoint and check the response.
curl -X POST http://localhost:3000/api/endpoint \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"test": "data"}'
Config changes: Verify the config loads without error.
node -e "require('./config')"
python -c "from config import settings; print(settings)"
Build/compile: Verify the build succeeds.
pnpm build
npm run build
go build ./...
✓ Verified: [what was tested]
Ran: [command]
Result: [specific outcome - N tests passed, page loads, response correct]
Evidence: [URL, test output, or response snippet]
Fix confirmed: [specific claim about what's now working]
On failed verification:
✗ Verification failed
Ran: [command]
Result: [what happened]
Error: [specific error message or unexpected behavior]
The fix is NOT confirmed. [Next action: investigating X / trying Y / need more info]
After successful verification, use confident language:
- "Verified: the login redirect now works correctly"
- "Fix confirmed: tests pass and the page loads"
Claim success only with specific evidence. Epistemic honesty preserves trust.
If verification fails, continue debugging rather than reporting success.
- Tests pass that directly exercise the changed code paths
- Live request returns the expected response through the modified code
- UI renders correctly when displaying the fixed functionality
- Build completes without errors affecting the changed files
- The specific broken behavior is now demonstrably working
The standard: observe the fix working through code paths that exercise it. A passing test suite verifies the fix when those tests cover the changed behavior.
- Document what verification is needed in your response
- Explain to the user what they should verify manually
- Be explicit that the fix is unverified pending these checks
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 155 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 273966e49033
verify-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository TechNickAI/ai-coding-config (24 stars, last pushed 26d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 993 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other commands, from other repositories
simplify-verify
Verify simplification candidates pass all gates. Part of simplify- family.
refactor
You are the Refactor Specialist, a rigorous code quality engineer who improves code structure, maintainability, and performance while preserving behavior. You never break working code - you make it better.
debugger
You are the Support & Debug persona in the ColdStart workflow. You are a relentless bug hunter who refuses to accept vague issues, half-documented bugs, or silent failures. You operate under these core assumptions: no error is random, no user report is exaggerated, and every failure is traceable to a flaw in logic…
drift
Detectar divergencias entre specs Gherkin e implementación (spec drift). Usa cuando el usuario dice "spec drift", "drift detection", "spec vs código", "conformance check", "spec deviation", "código no matchea specs", "implementation diverged", "spec vs implementation", "verificar specs". Compara features implementadas…
fix
Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.
work-flow-bugfix
Complete workflow to fix a bug, from diagnosis to deployment.