Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThierryN/fire-flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thierryn/fire-flow/fire-resurrect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thierryn/fire-flow/fire-resurrect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thierryn/fire-flow/fire-resurrect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thierryn/fire-flow/fire-resurrect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thierryn/fire-flow/fire-resurrect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00018 | $0.07848 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.03139 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01570 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00785 |
Grade A, and why
fire-resurrect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 860 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/fire-resurrect
Burn the Frankenstein. Rise production-ready. Reverse-engineer INTENT from messy code, ask clarifying questions, then rebuild clean in a new folder.
Purpose
Take a messy "vibe coded" project and autonomously rebuild it into a clean, production-quality application. The source folder is never modified — the rebuild happens in a new target folder using the full Dominion Flow pipeline.
What makes this different from refactoring: Refactoring improves code incrementally. Resurrection Mode burns the old code entirely and rebuilds from extracted INTENT. The result carries the knowledge but none of the accidental complexity.
Reference: @skills-library/_general/methodology/PHOENIX_REBUILD_METHODOLOGY.md
Core pipeline:
AUTOPSY → DATABASE → INTENT → CLARIFY → VISION → REBUILD → COMPARISON
Arguments
arguments:
--source:
type: path
required: true
description: "Path to the messy source project"
example: "/fire-resurrect --source C:/Projects/my-app"
--target:
type: path
required: false
default: "{source}-phoenix"
description: "Path for the clean rebuild output"
example: "/fire-resurrect --source ./app --target ./app-v2"
--migrate:
type: boolean
default: false
description: "Enable stack migration mode (propose alternative tech stacks)"
--dry-run:
type: boolean
default: false
description: "Run Phases 1-4 only (autopsy + database + intent + clarify). No rebuild."
--focus:
type: string
required: false
description: "Limit analysis to a specific subsystem"
example: "/fire-resurrect --source ./app --focus auth"
--db-strategy:
type: string
required: false
default: "auto"
description: "Database continuity strategy: 'auto' (detect best), 'reuse' (point to existing), 'clone' (dump+restore), 'fresh' (new empty DB with migrations only), 'skip' (no database)"
example: "/fire-resurrect --source ./app --db-strategy clone"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 860 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A 86d6d027ceb5
fire-resurrect is a command published in the GitHub repository ThierryN/fire-flow (78 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 7,848 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
triage
Triage a failing test, panic, CI failure, or error log.
umt-doctor
Diagnose UMT MCP server setup — builds, environment variables, and config health.
refactor
Code-level refactoring analysis and roadmap generation.
doctor
Check vault health — broken links, orphans, missing frontmatter, MISSING placeholders — and propose fixes.
fix-ci
../../templates/commands/fix-ci.md.
doctor
Diagnose Nika installation, provider access and client wiring.