Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow/kb-lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow/kb-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow/kb-lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow/kb-lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow/kb-lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00498 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
kb-lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/kb-lint — Health-check della LLM Wiki
Esegui un controllo qualità completo della LLM Wiki in $LLM_WIKI_PATH.
Steps
- Leggi schema
$LLM_WIKI_PATH/schema.md - Leggi index
$LLM_WIKI_PATH/wiki/index.md - Scansiona tutte le pagine in
wiki/projects/,wiki/concepts/,wiki/decisions/,wiki/lessons/
Checks da eseguire
🔴 CRITICO
- Pagine
wiki/projects/senza data aggiornamento - Link interni che puntano a file inesistenti
- File in
wiki/non referenziati inindex.md
🟡 WARN
- Pagine
wiki/projects/non aggiornate da >30 giorni (confronta conwiki/log.md) - Concetti in
wiki/concepts/non linkati da nessun progetto - Decisioni in
wiki/decisions/con stato "open" da >14 giorni - Progetti nello schema.md senza pagina wiki corrispondente
🟢 INFO
- Pattern in
wiki/concepts/candidati a promozione nella KB stabile (criteri: appare in ≥2 progetti, stabile da ≥2 sessioni, verificato in prod) - Pagine
wiki/lessons/non ancora linkate a pattern KB - Suggerimenti di merge per pagine simili
Output
Produci un report strutturato:
## 🔴 CRITICO (N problemi)
- [file] → [problema] → [azione suggerita]
## 🟡 WARN (N avvisi)
- [file] → [avviso] → [azione suggerita]
## 🟢 INFO (N suggerimenti)
- [concetto] → candidato promozione a KB/patterns/
## Statistiche
- Pagine totali: N
- Progetti tracciati: N/N
- Ultimo ingest: [data da log.md]
- Prossimo lint consigliato: [data + 7gg]
Appendi a wiki/log.md:
| YYYY-MM-DD | LINT | — | [N critico, N warn, N info] |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 54 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3172cf00d150
kb-lint is a command published in the GitHub repository thomascasali/claude-kb-workflow (2 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 498 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
get-to-work
Autonomous ops work. Args: [mode] [repeat]. Modes: tasks | opps | full | escalating (default). Repeat: cycle (keep going, default) | once (single pass). Run this before stepping away from an ops repo.
tidy
Consistency check for non-code repos with INDEX.md hierarchy. Verifies INDEX.md accuracy, MEMORY.md references, orphaned files, stale dates, and WAITING markers.
recap
Summarize what happened in the project since a given date. Produces a short lead on what's different now, backed by tables and lists covering completed work, state changes, backlog movement, and key decisions. Use when the user wants to catch up on project activity, review recent progress, or generate a status update…
whats-next
Generate an executive overview of the project. Synthesizes state, backlogs, and recent plans into a ranked action plan answering "What should we do next?".
batch-execute
Execute a batch of ops plans continuously without user input, storing any issues and user questions in a .md file to be processed with the user afterwards. Do NOT invoke this yourself! Should only be invoked by the user.
batch-plan
Create a batch of ops plans continuously without user input, storing any user questions in a .md file to be processed with the user afterwards. Do NOT invoke this yourself! Should only be invoked by the user.