Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/research-users)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/research-users"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/research-users/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/research-users"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/research-users.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00936 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00374 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
research-users scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to research-users — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 122 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/research-users -- User Research Synthesis
Turn raw research data into actionable user personas, behavioral segments, and customer journey maps. Accepts survey data, interview notes, feedback, analytics, or a product description for exploratory research.
Invocation
/research-users [upload survey results, interview notes, or feedback data]
/research-users B2B project management tool for agencies — help me understand our users
/research-users [paste user feedback or support ticket data]
Workflow
Step 1: Accept Research Inputs
Accept from any combination:
- Survey responses (CSV, spreadsheet, pasted)
- Interview notes or transcripts
- Support tickets or feature requests
- Product analytics / behavioral data
- NPS or satisfaction data
- Product description (for exploratory research without data)
Ask:
- What research do you have? What format?
- What do you want to understand? (who are our users, how do they differ, where's the friction)
- What decisions will this inform? (roadmap, positioning, pricing, onboarding)
Step 2: Build Personas
Apply the user-personas skill:
- Identify 3-4 distinct personas from the data
- For each persona: name, role, goals (JTBD), pains, gains, behavioral patterns
- Include unexpected insights — things that surprised you in the data
- Note persona prevalence (what % of your base each represents, if data allows)
Step 3: Segment Users
Apply the user-segmentation and market-segments skills:
- Create behavioral segments (not just demographics)
- For each segment: size, JTBD, product fit, willingness to pay, engagement level
- Identify the highest-value segment and the highest-growth segment
- Map segments to personas (how they overlap)
Step 4: Map the Customer Journey
Apply the customer-journey-map skill:
- Map the end-to-end journey: Awareness → Consideration → Onboarding → Active Use → Expansion → Advocacy
- For each stage: touchpoints, emotions, pain points, aha moments
- Identify the biggest drop-off points
- Highlight moments of delight worth amplifying
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 122 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 2de91d824085
research-users is a command published in the GitHub repository unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills (2 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 936 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to research-users, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
research-users compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| research-usersunixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills | Command | 2 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |