Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/stakeholder-map)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/stakeholder-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/stakeholder-map/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/stakeholder-map"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills/stakeholder-map.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00790 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00395 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
stakeholder-map scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to stakeholder-map — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/stakeholder-map -- Stakeholder Mapping & Communication Plan
Identify all stakeholders for a project, map them by influence and interest, and generate a communication plan that ensures the right people get the right information at the right time.
Invocation
/stakeholder-map New analytics platform launch
/stakeholder-map Pricing model change affecting all customers
/stakeholder-map [upload a project brief or org chart]
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Initiative
Ask:
- What is the project or initiative?
- What phase is it in? (planning, building, launching, post-launch)
- Who are the obvious stakeholders you already know about?
- Are there any politically sensitive dynamics to be aware of?
Step 2: Identify Stakeholders
Brainstorm stakeholders the user might not have considered:
- Internal: Engineering, Design, QA, Data, Legal, Finance, Marketing, Sales, Support, Leadership
- External: Customers, partners, vendors, regulators, board members
- Often missed: Adjacent teams, on-call engineers, customer success, documentation team
Step 3: Map to Power × Interest Grid
Apply the stakeholder-map skill:
Place each stakeholder in a quadrant:
HIGH INTEREST
│
KEEP SATISFIED │ MANAGE CLOSELY
(High Power, │ (High Power,
Low Interest) │ High Interest)
│
──────────────────────┼──────────────────────
│
MONITOR │ KEEP INFORMED
(Low Power, │ (Low Power,
Low Interest) │ High Interest)
│
LOW INTEREST
Step 4: Generate Communication Plan
## Stakeholder Map: [Initiative]
### Stakeholder Grid
| Stakeholder | Role | Power | Interest | Quadrant | Stance |
|------------|------|-------|----------|----------|--------|
### Communication Plan
#### Manage Closely (High Power, High Interest)
| Stakeholder | Channel | Frequency | Content | Owner |
|------------|---------|-----------|---------|-------|
#### Keep Satisfied (High Power, Low Interest)
| Stakeholder | Channel | Frequency | Content | Owner |
|------------|---------|-----------|---------|-------|
#### Keep Informed (Low Power, High Interest)
| Stakeholder | Channel | Frequency | Content | Owner |
|------------|---------|-----------|---------|-------|
#### Monitor (Low Power, Low Interest)
[Minimal communication — include in broad updates only]
### Potential Conflicts
[Where stakeholder interests may clash — with mitigation strategies]
### Escalation Path
[Who to go to when decisions are blocked]
### RACI Matrix
| Decision Area | Responsible | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|--------------|-------------|-------------|-----------|----------|
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 108 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 7db95fcb143d
stakeholder-map is a command published in the GitHub repository unixcrh/phuryn-pm-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 790 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to stakeholder-map, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.