Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add vibeic/vibe-ic/plugin install vibe-icWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/vibeic/vibe-ic/vibe-ic-phase2)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vibeic/vibe-ic/vibe-ic-phase2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vibeic/vibe-ic/vibe-ic-phase2/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/vibeic/vibe-ic/vibe-ic-phase2"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/vibeic/vibe-ic/vibe-ic-phase2.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01086 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00543 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00217 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-ic-phase2 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Missing arg? When
$ARGUMENTSis empty, prompt the user first:/vibe-ic-phase2 <project-dir>(e.g./vibe-ic-phase2 1st_benchmark_example/phase2_v0119.48-vendor). The AI must NOT guess the path; a concrete project path is required before continuing.
/phase2 — Phase 2 (RTL → SOF → on-board verify) entry
Prerequisite: <project>/generated_docs/L1..L13.json must exist (produced by /phase1 or /phase1).
Main execution (program-driven):
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/programs/design_one_shot_runner.py $ARGUMENTS
The runner runs: rig_topology skeleton → detect_ic_class → rtl_gen → reference_tb → yosys → qsf/sdc → otp_image_check → fpga_compile → fpga_burn → md905_verify → phase2_manifests → final_audit.
After the run completes, the AI must:
- Read
<project>/reports/phase23_one_shot.json, find the verdict and per-step status - If
<project>/phase2/stage1/formal/formal_authoring_request.jsonexists, invokeformal-verifynow on that artifact. This is a required fallback, not a suggestion in a manifest: read every unresolved L3/L6/L8 obligation ID, author only sound properties bound to visible RTL/declarations, updateproperty_contract.json, writeformal_expert_review.jsonwithinvocation_status: INVOKEDand adispositionslist containing one row per obligation (id,status, and the exactpropertyname for everyAUTHOREDrow), then runformal_property_run.pyandformal_proof_evidence_check.py. If no sound property can be authored, keep the requestverdict: INCOMPLETEand name the missing declaration/property; never replace it with a skip. - For every FAIL step:
rtl_genFAIL → checkaid_class_rtl_gen.pystderr; usually L8/L9 fields missing → return to/phase1to fill inreference_tbFAIL → iverilog parse / sim error; bounded RTL repair/retry loop (runner auto-retries up to 3 times); if retries are exhausted, modifyaid_class_rtl_gen.pytemplatefpga_compileFAIL → checkfpga/compile.log; common: QSF init_file SEARCH_PATH, SystemVerilog patterns Quartus does not accept → fix RTL template / qsf_genfpga_burnFAIL → parseerror_codeandfailed_gates(pre-burn structural-gate audit); close-loop each gate (callprograms/<gate>.pyto capture detail → patch RTL/L doc → re-run)md905_verifyFAIL →<unparsed>= driver did not see frame; first verify the SOF was burned in + connected to PIN_V10; ifexpected ≠ observedit is a real hardware bug and requires RTL repair (not a metal-layer ECO)
- All PASS → hint:
/phase3
Helper skills: spec-to-rtl / cdc-check / rtl-review / formal-verify / bringup-plan
Rule: flow_compliance_check.py --phase 2 --strict-structural Overall: PASS is required for Phase 2 to be considered complete. PASS_WITH_WAIVERS requires a corresponding waivers.json entry tagged review_required: true.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · +11 lines af45a4e925ab
- 9d ago First seen · 43 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 6a255b687908
vibe-ic-phase2 is a command published in the GitHub repository vibeic/vibe-ic (23 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,086 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
pcb-new
Start a new PCB project from a text description. Sources parts, generates a wired .kicadpcb, and hands off to EasyEDA for routing + JLCPCB ordering.
pcb-from-bom
Start a PCB project from an existing LCSC BOM file (CSV with C-numbers) and a design-intent description.
eol-report
EOL/EOS risk report — devices, OS versions, and firmware approaching or past end-of-life/end-of-support, prioritized by criticality.
pentest-wireless
You are an expert wireless security tester covering Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and IoT radio protocols. For AUTHORIZED testing only.
hw-troubleshoot
A hardware diagnostic command that scans for I²C devices, checks power, and analyzes signal quality. I²C is a short-distance communication bus used by many sensors and chips.
arckit.eu-data-act
You are helping an enterprise architect generate a EU Data Act Compliance Assessment (Regulation EU 2023/2854) for an organisation that manufactures connected products, holds data generated by those products, or provides data processing services. Most Data Act obligations apply from 12 September 2025.