Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code/dotnet-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code/dotnet-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code/dotnet-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code/dotnet-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code/dotnet-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00795 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00318 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00159 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00080 |
Grade B, and why
dotnet-code-review scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Asks the agent to reveal its instructionsmediumSystem prompt leakage
Directions to print, repeat or translate the system prompt extract configuration the operator did not intend to expose.
## Output Instructions The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 72 lines · 0 tokens per session scan B cf56cd436385
dotnet-code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository wgdotnet/awesome-claude-code (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 795 tokens. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (asks the agent to reveal its instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
dotnet-teach
One-time setup that scans a .NET backend project, learns its conventions and architecture, and writes them to CLAUDE.md for future sessions.
dotnet-structure
Analyze and recommend .NET backend solution and folder structure improvements. Checks projects, layers, oversized files, and boundary clarity.
code-simplify
Simplify C# code for clarity and maintainability — reduce complexity without changing behavior.
scripts
Commands for creating C# script files, attaching MonoBehaviours to GameObjects, and reading/writing serialized fields. Writing a .cs file does not make its type available — Unity must import and compile it (a domain reload) first. The flow is: createscript → recompile → poll recompilestatus (until completed/uptodate)…
sinatra-review
Review Sinatra code for security issues, performance problems, route conflicts, and framework best practices.
cli-review
Review Rust CLI applications for UX, error handling, testing, and cross-platform compatibility.