Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/wspringer/highs-mcp/fix-gh-issuegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/wspringer/highs-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/wspringer/highs-mcp/fix-gh-issue)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/wspringer/highs-mcp/fix-gh-issue"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/wspringer/highs-mcp/fix-gh-issue.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00294 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
fix-gh-issue scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Fix a GitHub issue
Please analyze and fix the GitHub issue: $ARGUMENTS.
Follow these steps:
- Use gh issue view to get the issue details
- Understand the problem described in the issue
- Search the codebase for relevant files
- Start developing the issue by creating a branch using
gh issue develop -c {issue number} --name {branch name}, taking the issue number from the arguments, using a sensible branch name. Include the issue number in the branch name, at the end. - Implement the necessary changes to fix the issue
- Write and run tests to verify the fix
- Ensure code passes linting and type checking
- Check if the README is still correct, given the changes. Correct when needed.
- Determine if this should be considered a patch, a minor or a major change, and ask me for confirmation.
- Document the change in a changeset, following knope's convention. Check the
CLAUDE.mdfile for details. Note that we need the changeset to document the effect of the change. It should be information to users of this project, not to maintainers of this project. For small changes, keep it brief. For major changes, include details on how this change is breaking what we had before.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e7aa7410759f
fix-gh-issue is a command published in the GitHub repository wspringer/highs-mcp (18 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 294 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.