Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/deploy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/deploy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/deploy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00280 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00056 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
deploy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
deploy — 部署三合一护栏
用户输入 /deploy $ARGUMENTS 触发 部署三合一护栏。
立刻读取并完整加载:
~/.claude/prompts/lib/05-部署/三合一部署护栏.md
按其"行为契约"段严格执行 3 段:
- 部署前体检(env vars 完整 / NEXTAUTH_URL 对 / auth 文件 diff 无意外 / 硬刹车未触发 / migration 兼容)
- OAuth 链路验证(部署前 grep auth 路径 + 部署后跑完整登录流程)
- 部署后立即写发布记录(CHANGELOG + docs/releases/YYYY-MM-DD-.md + 具体 deployment ID,禁止"latest")
参数含修饰符 → 叠加对应文件。
核心契约:任一步失败 → 立即 git revert,不在生产调试。OAuth 部署后必须手动跑一遍登录。
参数: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 23 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ac81c04a51df
deploy is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 280 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
deploy-release
Prepare and verify a staged or production deployment with rollback and smoke checks.
update-changelog
Update CHANGELOG.md with new entry based on git diff.
ijfw-ship
Run the IJFW workflow Ship phase (Deep D6). Pre-flight, deploy, and close. Usage: /ijfw-ship.
update-infos-release
Update Claude Code releases tracking (guide + landing + version bump).
changelog
Generate a changelog entry from git commits since the last tag using conventional commit format.
changelog
View recent CHANGELOG entries.