Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/done)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/done"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/done/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/done"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/done.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00320 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00128 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
done scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
done — 完工汇报 / 进度同步
用户输入 /done $ARGUMENTS 触发 标准完工汇报格式(禁止散文叙述、禁止"差不多")。
立刻读取并完整加载:
~/.claude/prompts/lib/09-元指令/完工汇报.md
按其"行为契约"段严格执行,用以下结构输出(不允许偷工):
✅ 已完成
🔍 验证证据(具体命令 / 测试输出 / git diff stat,每项配证据)
📂 改动落点(file + diff stat)
⚠️ 风险 / 副作用 / 未尽事项(没有就明写"无")
➡️ 下一步建议(选项 + 我的建议)
⏸ 等待用户 yes
禁止:
- "差不多了 / 应该没问题 / 看起来还行"
- 省略风险段
- 写完汇报就接着干下一个
核心契约:没证据的"完成"= 没完成。风险段必须诚实,包含临时绕过 / as any 抑制 / 未覆盖测试范围等。
参数: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A f0f6d076938d
done is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 320 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.
growth-seo
SEO audit and optimization for organic search ranking.
crear-skill
Crear, probar y mejorar skills de forma iterativa. Usa cuando el usuario dice "crear skill", "crear habilidad", "build skill", "create a skill", "skill development", "desarrollar skill", "nueva habilidad". Usa el workflow: draft → test → review → improve → repeat con evaluación cuantitativa y qualitative review.
iterate
Iteration delivery — delivery check + archive + commit & tag + bump version.
wcag-audit
Accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1/2.2 and the axe-core reference.
growth-ab-test
Command "growth-ab-test" from christopherlouet/claude-base, covering growth-ab-test agent, context, objective, workflow and expected output.