Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00430 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00172 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00086 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00043 |
Grade A, and why
implement-all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
implement-all — "全部实施" 语义澄清
用户输入 /implement-all $ARGUMENTS(或对话里出现"全部实施 / 全部做 / 按 plan 做")触发 澄清范围。
立刻读取并完整加载:
~/.claude/prompts/lib/03-实施/全部实施语义澄清.md
按其"行为契约"段严格执行:
- 默认狭义:只做用户最初提的需求的最小可达集,不是 plan 里列出的所有可选项
- 歧义必问:如果"全部"可以理解为 ≥ 2 种范围,必须问:
"全部"可以指:
A) 仅完成 [最初需求 X] 必需的最小动作(约 N 文件 / N 行)
B) 包含 plan 里所有 stage 和 cleanup(约 M 文件 / M 行,影响 [...])
你指的是 A 还是 B?
- 澄清前不允许大批量动作(即使 plan 写得很清楚)
"全部" 绝对不能默认包含:
- 触发生产 deploy(merge / push to main)
- 任何硬刹车清单动作
- 让用户体验降级 / 改 tier / 改 NAV
- "顺便清理 / 顺便重构 / 顺便优化"
核心契约:ProjectB 4-25 灾难就是"全部"语义未澄清导致 19 commit push main 触发生产。听昨天的(CLAUDE.md),不听今天的(口头授权)。
参数: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 82a25e93a121
implement-all is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.
growth-seo
SEO audit and optimization for organic search ranking.
crear-skill
Crear, probar y mejorar skills de forma iterativa. Usa cuando el usuario dice "crear skill", "crear habilidad", "build skill", "create a skill", "skill development", "desarrollar skill", "nueva habilidad". Usa el workflow: draft → test → review → improve → repeat con evaluación cuantitativa y qualitative review.
iterate
Iteration delivery — delivery check + archive + commit & tag + bump version.
wcag-audit
Accessibility audit based on WCAG 2.1/2.2 and the axe-core reference.
growth-ab-test
Command "growth-ab-test" from christopherlouet/claude-base, covering growth-ab-test agent, context, objective, workflow and expected output.