implement-all

A command that clarifies what “do everything” means before carrying out a development plan.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when someone asks to implement everything, follow the whole plan, or otherwise gives an ambiguous broad-scope instruction.
Why use it?
Words such as “all” can mean only the minimum required work or every optional stage and cleanup, which can cause unintended large changes or a production deployment.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/implement-all
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills
Per session 27 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 430 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00027 $0.00430
Opus 5 $0.00014 $0.00215
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00086
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00043

Measured 2d ago against content hash 82a25e93a121, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implement-all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/implement-all.md · 35 lines

What it actually says

implement-all — "全部实施" 语义澄清

用户输入 /implement-all $ARGUMENTS(或对话里出现"全部实施 / 全部做 / 按 plan 做")触发 澄清范围

立刻读取并完整加载: ~/.claude/prompts/lib/03-实施/全部实施语义澄清.md

按其"行为契约"段严格执行:

  1. 默认狭义:只做用户最初提的需求的最小可达集,不是 plan 里列出的所有可选项
  2. 歧义必问:如果"全部"可以理解为 ≥ 2 种范围,必须问:
"全部"可以指:
  A) 仅完成 [最初需求 X] 必需的最小动作(约 N 文件 / N 行)
  B) 包含 plan 里所有 stage 和 cleanup(约 M 文件 / M 行,影响 [...])
你指的是 A 还是 B?
  1. 澄清前不允许大批量动作(即使 plan 写得很清楚)

"全部" 绝对不能默认包含:

  • 触发生产 deploy(merge / push to main)
  • 任何硬刹车清单动作
  • 让用户体验降级 / 改 tier / 改 NAV
  • "顺便清理 / 顺便重构 / 顺便优化"

核心契约:ProjectB 4-25 灾难就是"全部"语义未澄清导致 19 commit push main 触发生产。听昨天的(CLAUDE.md),不听今天的(口头授权)。

参数: $ARGUMENTS

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 35 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 82a25e93a121

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implement-all is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 27d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 430 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.