playbook

playbook is a command for coding agents from xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills. It costs 14 tokens per session (89 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An alternate command name for a playbook command. A playbook is a collection of reusable instruction templates.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to run the instructions stored in the local pb.md playbook file. The specific playbook actions depend on that file.
Why use it?
It lets users invoke the same playbook instructions with a longer, more descriptive command name.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/playbook
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for playbook

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/playbook.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/playbook)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/playbook"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills/playbook.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 89 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00014 $0.00089
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00044
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00018
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00009

Measured 4d ago against content hash dc5ab9568d4b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

playbook scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/playbook.md · 9 lines

What it actually says

playbook — /pb 的完整名别名

这是 /pb 的完整名别名。用户输入 /playbook $ARGUMENTS,请按 ~/.claude/commands/pb.md 中的指引执行。

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 9 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A dc5ab9568d4b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

playbook is a command published in the GitHub repository xcodethink/open-claude-code-skills (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 89 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.