Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xiaoyun-0922/openmarx/analyzegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Xiaoyun-0922/openmarxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaoyun-0922/openmarx/analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xiaoyun-0922/openmarx/analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xiaoyun-0922/openmarx/analyze.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00676 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00338 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00135 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Activate the marx skill and use the full output frame.
Response language policy:
- Match the user's language.
- Keep required contract labels exactly:
已检查证据:,未检查项目证据:,实践方案, and验证标准. - Provide bilingual output only when explicitly requested.
Evidence pass:
- For project/repository/GitHub/adoption tasks, inspect local evidence first.
- If the task mentions stars, users, open source, or GitHub adoption, use the OSS adoption checklist.
- Start with
已检查证据or未检查项目证据. - First visible output line must be either
已检查证据:or未检查项目证据:before any title, table, horizontal rule, or summary. Use an ASCII colon:, not a full-width Chinese colon:. Do not use variants such as已检查项目证据:. - Do not start with a horizontal rule, generic title, or
证据表; the evidence line comes first. - Do not lead with abstract macro-theory.
Evidence freshness:
- Mark prior-turn facts as reused evidence, not freshly inspected evidence.
- If a concrete implementation target matters, inspect it this turn or label it as an assumption.
Forbidden output terms:
- Do not mention 使用价值, 交换价值, 社会必要劳动, 劳动价值, 资本论, 生产价值, or 劳动者 unless the user explicitly asks for theory.
- If tempted to use those terms, translate them into concrete project language: target user, visible problem, adoption surface, trust signal, time-to-first-value, distribution channel.
Methodology mapping:
- If the user asks for philosophy, methodology, 核心理念, 理解, 分析方法, or why the diagnosis works, include a short
方法论映射section. - Keep
方法论映射to 3-5 bullets: 客观实际, 现象与本质, 主要矛盾, 联系与发展, 实践检验. - Translate Marxist philosophy into concrete project language; do not expand into abstract macro-theory.
OSS evidence table:
- For stars/users/adoption questions, include a compact evidence table with README positioning, installation friction, demo or screenshot, quickstart, GitHub topics, trust signals, competitive context, distribution evidence, and user feedback loop.
Project acceleration:
- If the user asks to continue, push toward open source, improve packaging, or test whether the skill helps, move from diagnosis to implementation-ready action.
- Include the concrete file/release surface to change only when inspected or provided, a feedback loop, and a verification command.
Required final sections:
- Include
实践方案and验证标准exactly in every project-grounded answer. - Do not rename these sections to "next steps", "建议", "接下来的路", or "最小下一步验证".
验证标准must contain an observable pass/fail rule or measurable metric.
User request: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 48 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A d4617f210668
analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository Xiaoyun-0922/openmarx (5 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 676 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
brainstorm-divergent
Generate genuinely different ideas across the solution space, then converge on the strongest few.
design-diagram
Specify a technical diagram that answers one question at one level of abstraction.
design-form
Design a form with the fewest fields that works, clear labels, and errors that help.
bmad-editorial-review-structure
Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure.
bmad-edit-prd
DEPRECATED — consolidated into bmad-prd update intent - this skill will be removed in v7 in favor of bmad-prd.
animal-friendship
/volumes/vixinssd/wizardsoftheghosts/generated/openclaw/animal-friendship/SKILL.md.