Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/XPOZpublic/xpoz-cursor-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xpozpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin/xpoz-track)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xpozpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin/xpoz-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xpozpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin/xpoz-track/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xpozpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin/xpoz-track"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xpozpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin/xpoz-track.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00089 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00036 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00018 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
xpoz-track scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Social Media Tracking
Request: $ARGUMENTS
Use the xpoz-social-tracking skill to handle this tracking request. Follow the skill instructions exactly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 12 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 965e22c34d09
xpoz-track is a command published in the GitHub repository XPOZpublic/xpoz-cursor-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 89 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
init-workspace-flow-discovery
Phase 3 Discovery of init-workspace-flow.
ui-aqa-flow-test-report-analysis
Phase 7 Test Report Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
adhoc-flow
Workflow for the rest of tasks: lightweight documentation, build, track, synchronize, etc.
api-aqa-flow-execution-and-report-analysis
Phase 6 Execution & Report Analysis of api-aqa-flow (USER INTERACTION REQUIRED).
ui-aqa-flow-code-analysis
Phase 3 Code Analysis of ui-aqa-flow.
modernization-flow-grouping
Phase 4 Class Grouping of modernization-flow.