Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/xzawed/claude-grok-build-plugin/routegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/xzawed/claude-grok-build-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/xzawed/claude-grok-build-plugin/route)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/xzawed/claude-grok-build-plugin/route"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/xzawed/claude-grok-build-plugin/route.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00239 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00120 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
route scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Call MCP tool grok_build_route with the user's task as task and any known signals.
This tool only recommends — it does not run Grok, edit files, or change billing.
Present:
risk(LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH)worker(claude|grok|plan_then_grok)reasons,suggestedTool,suggestedFlags,safetyNotesnextAction— machine step (handle_with_claude|call_mcp_tool+ tool/flags). Prefer this over re-deriving the plan.
If nextAction.phase is call_mcp_tool and requiresHumanGateBeforeDelegate is true, run
plan first, then wait for approval before delegate/verify. If worker is grok or
plan_then_grok, ask before editing tools unless the user already asked to delegate.
After edits, use /grok:review. Never auto-commit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 18 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A a6ecef22e419
route is a command published in the GitHub repository xzawed/claude-grok-build-plugin (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 239 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge
Finish a PR properly: every check green, every review addressed — human and bot — then merge and clean up.
pr
Prepare and open a pull request the senior way: gate, template, scrubbed, everything visible.
spec
Spec-first design: a gap-closing interview that produces a complete spec, with a quality controller that blocks until every section is answered and every question resolved.
plan
Turn an approved spec into an implementation plan an engineer with zero context could execute — with a quality controller that blocks placeholders and hollow tasks.
todo
The quality-gated task list: tasks with real descriptions, testable acceptance criteria, and evidence — a task only closes when the controller agrees it is done.
backlog
The project layer: milestones, epics, and user stories with refusing controllers — spec-seeded, sprint-ready.