Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace/hpc-checkup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace/hpc-checkup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace/hpc-checkup/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace/hpc-checkup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace/hpc-checkup.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00257 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00129 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
hpc-checkup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a resource checkup on the Yale SOM HPC cluster and report in plain language.
Follow the self-diagnosing-resource-use skill. Steps:
- If a job ID was given (
$ARGUMENTS), check that job. Otherwise list my recent jobs withsacct -u $USER --starttime=today --format=JobID,JobName,Elapsed,AllocCPUS,TotalCPU,MaxRSS,Stateand pick the finished ones. - Run
seff JOBIDon each. - Tell me, for each job, whether it used what it requested — CPUs, memory, time, and GPU if any — and give the concrete
--mem/--cpus-per-task/--timeI should request next time. Translate the numbers; don't just pasteseffoutput. - Flag anything wasteful (idle GPU, <10% CPU efficiency, memory hugely over-requested) and the one change that fixes it.
Run only read-only accounting commands. Do not submit or cancel jobs.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 16 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A f882fe5f3530
hpc-checkup is a command published in the GitHub repository yale-som-hpc/claude-code-marketplace (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 257 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
verify-math
Verify a self-authored mathematical result end to end by routing claims across adversarial review, numerical falsification, symbolic or CAS checks, and Lean, then aggregating one report. Use when a theorem, proposition, conjecture, or paper-wide mathematical argument needs the appropriate combination of verification…
replication-package
Scaffold or audit a social-science replication package at a target directory, and audit the manuscript and its archived research objects against FAIR principles.
diff
Quantitative volume comparison between a CadQuery model and a reference STEP file.
simulation-calibrator
Test and refine simulation accuracy with validation loops, bias detection, and continuous improvement frameworks.
arg-diagram
ARG academic-paper diagram mode — standalone structural & conceptual diagram generation.
graphite-morphology-classify
Classify graphite in a cast-iron micrograph per ASTM A247 / ISO 945-1, quantify nodularity, and read the matrix — the single most diagnostic observation in a cast-iron case.