Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/handoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/handoff/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code/handoff.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01080 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00432 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00216 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
handoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Hand the following task to Antigravity as a whole, through the plugin's agy-handoff
wrapper, and act as the verifier only.
Requirement: $ARGUMENTS
Why this shape and not the usual delegation (measured on 8 merged pull requests from public Go repositories, 2 runs each, 2026-09; details in PR #91): delegating implementation file by file while you read the code and write specifications cost 1.3–1.7× a solo run. Handing the whole task over and verifying only by running the tests cost 0.58× a solo Opus 5 run per passing task (0.43× on large tasks, ≥700 changed lines; more than solo on small ones), 16/16 tests passed, and the Claude side alone was 0.16×. The cost you avoid is your reading: every file you open to "check" comes back as cache-read tokens on every later turn. A blinded reviewer rated hand-off code 0.6 of 5 below a solo run (dead code, duplicated helpers, unasked-for options) and about 0.2 below the human-merged PR — so the result gets the human review a first draft would get, after the tests are green, not from you.
Do this:
- Decide whether to hand off at all. Hand off when the task is a coherent feature or change of roughly 200+ lines with tests that define "done" (existing tests that must pass, or tests you write first). Do not hand off a small edit, a judgement call, or work without a verification command — those cost more this way, measured.
- Write the requirement as observable behaviour, 10–30 lines: context, what must be
true afterwards, constraints (language, no new dependencies, conventions), which test
files exist and must pass unmodified, and the deliverable ("leave changes uncommitted").
Do not name the files or identifiers the executor should create unless the tests do.
Do not read the repository to write it — if you do not know the codebase, ask agy
for a digest first (
agy-delegate --digest --dir . "…"), or write the tests, but do not open source files yourself. - Run it from a clean tree, on a branch, synchronously if you are headless:
agy-handoff --dir . --tests <test files> - <<'REQ' <the requirement> REQ--verifyis detected fromgo.mod/package.json/Cargo.toml/pyproject.toml/Makefile; pass it explicitly when the repository's gate is something else. Expect 20–120 minutes for a real feature. In an interactive session, Claude Code's Bash tool cuts a call off after its timeout — add--background, then poll withagy-job status <id>and collect withagy-job result <id>; do not touch the repository meanwhile. (Headlessclaude -p: run it synchronously and raise the Bash timeout.) - Do not read the diff while it runs, and do not edit files afterwards. The wrapper
runs the verification command itself, sends at most one fix-up delegation quoting the
failing output verbatim, runs it again (exit 4 if verification is still red after the
allowed fix-ups; exit 12 if an executor call timed out and verification failed), and
checks that the named test files were not modified (exit 6 if they were, uncommitted or
committed). Your job is to read its report:
PASS/FAIL/TEST FILES MODIFIED, the delegation count, the change summary, what the executor said. - Report the outcome in a few lines and hand the diff to the human as a first draft: what to look for is dead code, helpers duplicated beside an existing library, options nobody asked for, mismatched import grouping. If it failed, decide between one more hand-off with a sharper requirement (say what the failure told you) and taking over — do not patch the executor's work by hand and call it a hand-off.
Remember the measured boundaries: small tasks lose money here; the arm took 3–4× the wall-clock of a solo run; and asking the executor to review its own diff afterwards changed the review score by 0.07 for about $1 a run — skip that.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 62 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 88c7fabe864f
handoff is a command published in the GitHub repository yuting0624/antigravity-for-claude-code (416 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,080 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-20.
Other commands, from other repositories
octo-loop
Your first output line MUST be: 🐙 Octopus Loop Mode.
octo-debug
Debug a symptom through reproducible, bounded evidence.
cloudflare-workers:test-setup
Interactive Vitest setup wizard for Cloudflare Workers testing. Configures @cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers, mocks bindings, and creates example tests.
kill-mutants
Analyze surviving mutants from a mutation testing run and write targeted unit tests to kill them. Re-runs mutations to confirm kills.
record
Record a browser walkthrough of a URL using Antigravity (agy). Generates .webm video, screenshots, and a report. Auto-converts to MP4 if ffmpeg is available.
build-fix
Systematically investigate and fix build errors, TypeScript errors, or test failures with minimal diffs.