retrospective

retrospective is a command for Claude Code from zhyx12/projtool. It costs 36 tokens per session (560 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command that records experiment findings in a documentation repository. It summarizes established results, failed attempts, and evidence from experiment runs and journals.

In plain words
What is it for?
Reviewing experiment runs, comparing metrics, documenting what worked or failed in findings.md, and committing the updated findings.
Why use it?
It keeps useful lessons from a work session from being lost and helps prevent repeating unsuccessful approaches.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Good fit Reviewing experiment runs, comparing metrics, documenting what worked or failed in findings.md, and committing the updated findings.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhyx12/projtool

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for retrospective

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for retrospective

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/zhyx12/projtool/retrospective.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 36 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 560 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00036 $0.00560
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00224
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00112
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00056

Measured 2mo ago against content hash bbc8f420d40e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

retrospective scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

src/projtool/assets/project_templates/claude/commands/retrospective.md · 60 lines

What it actually says

You are running the user's /retrospective command. The goal is Sionic-style knowledge capture: whatever this session learned must land in the docs repo NOW, not evaporate when the conversation ends. Failed attempts are the most valuable entries — they're what prevents re-running dead ends next month.

Steps

  1. Determine the experiment scope. If the session touched one experiment, use it; if several, do one findings pass per experiment (confirm with the user which ones matter).

  2. Gather the raw record for each experiment:

    • mcp__projtool__list_runs (with experiment_id, generous limit) and mcp__projtool__compare_runs for the metric table;
    • the auto-appended docs/exp/<slug>/journal.md (chronological log);
    • anything notable from this conversation that the journal can't know: hypotheses, dead ends, environment quirks, manual bypasses.
  3. Draft into docs/exp/<slug>/findings.md (create if absent). Structure — keep existing content, append/update sections:

    # Findings — <experiment>
    
    ## Established (what we now believe, with evidence)
    - <claim> — run `<run_id>`, <metric>=<value>
    
    ## Failed attempts (do not retry without new information)
    | Tried | Why it failed | Evidence (run / log) |
    |---|---|---|
    
    ## Environment / tooling gotchas
    - <exact fix, exact command>
    
    ## Open questions
    - <question> — what evidence would settle it
    
  4. Show the draft to the user for corrections. Do not invent conclusions the runs don't support — if a number is missing from the manifests, say so rather than reconstructing it from memory.

  5. After approval, commit in the docs repo (explicit paths, matching projtool convention):

    cd <container>/docs && git add exp/<slug>/findings.md && git commit -m "findings: <slug> — <one-line summary>"
    
  6. If the session also revealed installs/config that a fresh instance needs, remind the user those belong in .proj-tool/env-setup.sh (append them now if they aren't there).

Before designing the NEXT experiment, read findings.md + journal.md first — that's the whole point of writing them.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A bbc8f420d40e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

retrospective is a command published in the GitHub repository zhyx12/projtool (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 560 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

retrospective compared with commands from other repositories

retrospective next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
retrospectivezhyx12/projtoolCommand12mo agoMITA36Claude Code
standupvvedantb/evaCommand101yesterdayMITA0Claude Code
gitazrtydxb/procoderCommand21111d agoApache-2.0A20Claude Code
session-reportdamusix/atomic-claudeCommand1155d agoMITA31Claude Code
commitechoVic/blade-codeCommand18124d agoMITA8Claude Code
git-workflowHermeticOrmus/LibreUIUX-Claude-CodeCommand1151mo agoMITA14Claude Code
commitjoaquimscosta/arkhe-claude-pluginsCommand2222d agoMITA11Claude Code