Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/zoo-code-org/zoo-code/commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-CodeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00629 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to commit — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
-
Analyze the current changes to understand what needs to be committed:
# Check for staged and unstaged changes git status --short # View the diff of all changes (staged and unstaged) git diff HEAD -
Based on the diff output, formulate a commit message following conventional commit format:
- feat: New feature or functionality
- fix: Bug fix
- refactor: Code restructuring without behavior change
- docs: Documentation changes
- test: Adding or updating tests
- chore: Maintenance tasks, dependencies, configs
- style: Formatting, whitespace, no logic changes
Format:
type(scope): brief descriptionExamples:
feat(api): add user authentication endpointfix(ui): resolve button alignment on mobilerefactor(core): simplify error handling logicdocs(readme): update installation instructions
-
Stage all unstaged changes:
git add -A -
Commit with the generated message:
git commit -m "type(scope): brief description"If pre-commit hooks fail:
- Review the error output (linter errors, type checking errors, etc.)
- Fix the identified issues in the affected files
- Re-stage the fixes:
git add -A - Retry the commit:
git commit -m "type(scope): brief description"
-
Push to the remote repository:
git pushIf pre-push hooks fail:
- Review the error output (test failures, linter errors, etc.)
- Fix the identified issues in the affected files
- Stage and commit the fixes using steps 3-4
- Retry the push:
git push
Tips for good commit messages:
- Keep the first line under 72 characters
- Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "update", not "added", "fixes", "updated")
- Be specific but concise
- If multiple unrelated changes exist, consider splitting into separate commits
Common hook failures and fixes:
- Linter errors: Run the project's linter (e.g.,
npm run lintorpnpm lint) to see all issues, then fix them - Type checking errors: Run type checker (e.g.,
npx tsc --noEmit) to identify type issues - Test failures: Run tests (e.g.,
npm testorpnpm test) to identify failing tests and fix them - Format issues: Run formatter (e.g.,
npm run formatorpnpm format) to auto-fix formatting
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 81 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A efc081261190
commit is a command published in the GitHub repository Zoo-Code-Org/Zoo-Code (1,752 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 629 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to commit, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.