LifeHack-2026 AGENTS.md

Project instructions for Woven, the user-facing product in the LifeHack-2026 repository. They describe the product’s required behavior, architecture, trust rules and the documents to read before making changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when changing Woven, preparing a demo or submission, installing its local components, or working on branding and documentation.
Why use it?
They provide the project’s source of truth and help prevent changes that conflict with existing decisions, security boundaries or acceptance requirements.

Instructions file for CodexOpenCode

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add instructions/ducksss/lifehack-2026/agents-md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ducksss/LifeHack-2026

Made for: Codex, OpenCode.

Per session 1,786 This file is loaded in full into every session.
When invoked 1,786 The same file — it is already loaded in full.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.01786 $0.01786
Opus 5 $0.00893 $0.00893
Sonnet 5 $0.00357 $0.00357
Haiku 4.5 $0.00179 $0.00179

Measured 3d ago against content hash 6898e5e3383c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

LifeHack-2026 AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

AGENTS.md · 149 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 149 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Woven agent instructions

This repository is the LifeHack 2026 submission workspace. The user-facing product is Woven; LifeHack-2026 is only the repository name.

Canonical context

Before changing the project, inspect git status, preserve unrelated user work, and read these files in order:

  1. docs/HANDOVER.md — current decisions, implementation status, external state, archived branches, and next work
  2. docs/PRD.md — binding implemented product contract and acceptance criteria
  3. docs/architecture.md — tool contracts, state machine, and trust boundaries
  4. README.md — public story, setup, screenshots, and working demo instructions

Then route by task:

  • Pitch, judging, recording, or demo: read script.md, then docs/DEVPOST_SUBMISSION.md and docs/BRAND_GUIDE.md.
  • Plugin, ChatGPT, Codex, or local installation: read docs/INSTALLATION.md, .codex-plugin/plugin.json, .mcp.json, and .agents/plugins/marketplace.json.
  • Branding, slides, or gallery assets: read docs/BRAND_GUIDE.md; the current judge deck is docs/Woven-Hackathon-Pitch.pptx.

When documentation conflicts, implemented behavior and tests win. Use this precedence: code/tests and docs/PRD.mddocs/architecture.mddocs/HANDOVER.md → public/pitch material. A storyboard never makes a planned feature real.

Current snapshot

  • The working product is one Node.js service with a React MCP App, HTTP/stdio MCP transports, a bounded LangGraph.js mission-orchestration layer, deterministic commerce verification, /demo, /webmcp, /identity, /merchant, /install, SQLite state, and a simulated Visa adapter.
  • /webmcp exposes seven top-level browser-native site tools over the same server router and visible Choice Center; identity and purchase remain human-only.
  • The canonical rainy-weekend camping request produces complete, weather-compatible, one-merchant carts and an exact, expiring confirmation.
  • Non-camping requests route through a credential-dormant open-world POC that interprets a validated MissionSpec, discovers connected offers and cited web research, composes and verifies carts, retries at most once, and fails closed when OpenAI is unavailable. Web research is never checkout evidence.
  • The connector-style demo identity check is implemented and enforced before checkout with a short-lived session, state, PKCE, an allowlisted callback, and a single-use code. It is simulated and never a Visa login or KYC claim.
  • The judge deck includes the working demo identity handoff between cart choice and exact checkout review.
  • Public HTTPS deployment and the demo video are complete. A shareable ChatGPT connection, real merchant/Visa integrations, and final Devpost publication remain outstanding.

Read the full file on GitHub · 149 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 149 lines · 1,786 tokens per session scan A 6898e5e3383c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

LifeHack-2026 AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository Ducksss/LifeHack-2026 (5 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 1,786 tokens to every session, about $0.0089 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.