Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexmond/alexmskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
review-agents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "review-agents",
"description": "Specialist review subagents for any stack — code review, test running, and dependency/CVE auditing on lighter model tiers. Each finds the project's own build, lint and audit commands (Maven, Gradle, npm, Python, Go, Rust, .NET, Ruby and more) instead of assuming one. No-write by construction: Write and Edit are withheld, so they read, build, and report without touching the working tree.",
"version": "1.2.1",
"author": {
"name": "Alex Mondshain",
"email": "[email protected]"
},
"homepage": "https://www.alexmond.org/alexmskills/",
"repository": "https://github.com/alexmond/alexmskills",
"license": "MIT",
"keywords": [
"agents",
"code-review",
"testing",
"dependencies",
"cve",
"polyglot"
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 3 agents travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 87 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago Changed · -1 lines 5c7912e18c92
- 1mo ago Changed 13113ca2d99f
- 1mo ago First seen · 22 lines scan A 0d5fc8231503
review-agents is a plugin published in the GitHub repository alexmond/alexmskills (9 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
atc-skills
A 12-skill depth pack for ATC — the ACM SIGOPS Annual Technical Conference (formerly the USENIX Annual Technical Conference): USENIX's broad practical-systems venue now under SIGOPS, the new two-round extended-abstract HotCRP review, double-blind reviewing, the Deployed Systems / experience-paper track, USENIX-lineage.
quality-assurance-suite
Find gaps that could break a release, mislead a maintainer, or make a passing test meaningless.
opencode-power-pack
Fifty-five software-development workflows for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and Pi.
suede-code
Code quality subset: one-pass review plus an A-F ship verdict (suede-code), deep findings with TypeScript, React, Next.js, OWASP, and database checklists (suede-code-review), a grade-only verdict with instant-F triggers and grade caps (suede-code-grader), and CI branch protection that gates the merge (suede-ci-gate).
aspark
An agile AI product team for Claude Code — Specify, Plan, Act, Review, Keep. A Product Owner, Designer, Engineering Manager, Reviewer, QA Tester and Release Manager work your feature through a gated delivery loop.
diffctx
Selects the minimum code an LLM needs to review a git diff.