Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add alexmond/alexmskills --skill review-agentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alexmond/alexmskillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/alexmond/alexmskills/review-agents.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00178 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00071 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00036 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
review-agents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review agents
Select the requested specialist: pr-reviewer, test-runner, or
dependency-auditor. Their complete definitions live at ../../agents/<name>.md
relative to this skill. Read the selected file and preserve its full checklist,
tool restrictions, build commands, and report format. Do not substitute a summary.
In Claude Code dispatch the corresponding installed plugin agent. In Codex read the dispatch adapter, then send the full definition and review scope to a child. If agent tools are unavailable, execute that complete procedure in the current context and state that it was a single-context review. Reviewers report findings; they do not silently fix source or publish changes.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago First seen · 18 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A ca2de7609220
review-agents is a skill published in the GitHub repository alexmond/alexmskills (9 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 178 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
semgrep-rule-variant-creator
Creates language variants of existing Semgrep rules. Use when porting a Semgrep rule to specified target languages. Takes an existing rule and target languages as input, produces independent rule+test directories for each language.
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
ln-55-test-suite-auditor
Audits existing tests for risk coverage, reliable oracles and maintenance value; does not edit tests.
ln-32-test-strategy-planner
Plans risk-based test portfolios and acceptance evidence; does not write or execute tests.
ln-42-dependency-upgrader
Upgrades dependencies in reversible batches with version-specific compatibility and regression checks.
ln-51-acceptance-test-builder
Builds, updates or retires scoped acceptance tests and verifies execution; does not repair product code.