Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/aperivue/medsci-skills/medsci-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/aperivue/medsci-skills/medsci-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/aperivue/medsci-skills/medsci-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/aperivue/medsci-skills/medsci-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/aperivue/medsci-skills/medsci-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
medsci-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 24d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "medsci-review",
"displayName": "MedSci Review & Compliance",
"description": "Pre-submission self-review, peer-review drafting, and reporting-guideline compliance audits against EQUATOR checklists.",
"author": {
"name": "Aperivue",
"url": "https://github.com/Aperivue"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills#skills",
"repository": "https://github.com/Aperivue/medsci-skills",
"keywords": [
"medical-research",
"clinical-research",
"reporting-guidelines",
"peer-review",
"risk-of-bias"
],
"source": "./",
"strict": false,
"skills": [
"./skills/check-reporting",
"./skills/peer-review",
"./skills/self-review"
]
}What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 183 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What ships with it
1 file beside marketplace.json#medsci-review in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 24d ago Changed · +14 lines f7c6be1512d1
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines scan A a3f1af3c2871
medsci-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository Aperivue/medsci-skills (349 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other plugins, from other repositories
agb-recht-pruefer
Gigantischer AGB-Rechtsprüfer und Klausel-Entwerfer für deutsches Recht: §§ 305 bis 310 BGB, UKlaG, B2C/B2B, Branchen-AGB, Redlining, Klauselrisiko und rechtssichere Entwurfsworkflows.
han-communication
Foundational communication plugin for the Han suite. Owns the canonical readability standard, the writing-voice profile, and the explanation standard for talking to a reader who will not implement the work, plus the readability-guidance skill that surfaces the first two into a calling skill's own context for in-voice…
knowledge-and-memory
Research methodology, corpus search, persistent memory, iterative workflows, and project knowledge management.
git
Git workflow tools: commits, PRs, review inbox, checkout, and work triage.
deadeye
Fits model, effort, and context to each task via a deterministic policy kernel behind Claude Code hooks. He doesn't waste shots.
ar
ar — autoresearch: a skill-only autonomous experiment loop. Propose → measure → keep winners → repeat, against any numeric objective, with noise-floor gating so nothing is banked on noise. Five skills: /ar:start opens a run (dedicated branch + baseline noise floor), /ar:resume advances it, /ar:status prints read-only…