agb-recht-pruefer

agb-recht-pruefer is a plugin for Claude Code from Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht. Its manifest loads nothing; the 202 skills it bundles cost 9,863 tokens per session together, scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

Ein Werkzeug für die Prüfung und Erstellung Allgemeiner Geschäftsbedingungen nach deutschem Recht. AGB sind vorformulierte Vertragsbedingungen, die eine Seite für mehrere Verträge verwendet.

In plain words
What is it for?
Für Vertragsprüfungen, Redlining, Klauselentwürfe, Compliance-Arbeit und die Bewertung von Risiken nach §§ 305 bis 310 BGB und dem UKlaG.
Why use it?
Es bündelt die Prüfung typischer Klauselrisiken, die Unterscheidung zwischen Verbrauchern und Unternehmen sowie die Überarbeitung problematischer Vertragsformulierungen.

Plugin for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Good fit Für Vertragsprüfungen, Redlining, Klauselentwürfe, Compliance-Arbeit und die Bewertung von Risiken nach §§ 305 bis 310 BGB und dem UKlaG.

Compare 6 plugins from other repositories ↓
Install in Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/plugin install agb-recht-pruefer
About the project

Claude – Deutsche rechtliche Fähigkeiten is an experimental collection of German-language skills, sub-agents, plugins, and workflows for legal work. It is intended for law firms, legal departments, and advisers handling areas such as employment, corporate, insolvency, data protection, and litigation law. The catalogue entries are the collection’s own skills, instructions, and plugin packaging.

Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht · 1,592 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agb-recht-pruefer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agb-recht-pruefer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/agb-recht-pruefer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured The manifest loads nothing itself; its 202 skills cost 9,863 tokens a session between them.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

agb-recht-pruefer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

agb-recht-pruefer/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 24 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "agb-recht-pruefer",
  "version": "444.3.0",
  "description": "Gigantischer AGB-Rechtsprüfer und Klausel-Entwerfer für deutsches Recht: §§ 305 bis 310 BGB, UKlaG, B2C/B2B, Branchen-AGB, Redlining, Klauselrisiko und rechtssichere Entwurfsworkflows.",
  "license": "Apache-2.0 OR MIT",
  "author": {
    "name": "Klotzkette",
    "email": "[email protected]"
  },
  "homepage": "https://github.com/Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht",
  "keywords": [
    "agb",
    "bgb",
    "klauselkontrolle",
    "vertragsrecht",
    "verbraucherrecht",
    "unternehmerverkehr",
    "uklag",
    "klauselentwurf",
    "redlining",
    "compliance"
  ]
}
Contents

What it installs

The manifest is a name and a version. 202 skills travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 9,863 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday Changed 71dbcc795be3
  2. 2d ago Changed 2f5331d0cf4f
  3. 4d ago Changed 6dd86461f7d2
  4. 5d ago Changed ee4d031a048b
  5. 6d ago Changed efcfb2fdfdd9
  6. 7d ago Changed 4e1bfa06fe8e
  7. 12d ago First seen · 24 lines scan A 6875a016a304

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agb-recht-pruefer is a plugin published in the GitHub repository Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht (1,592 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.