Claude – Deutsche rechtliche Fähigkeiten is an experimental collection of German-language skills, sub-agents, plugins, and workflows for legal work. It is intended for law firms, legal departments, and advisers handling areas such as employment, corporate, insolvency, data protection, and litigation law. The catalogue entries are the collection’s own skills, instructions, and plugin packaging.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht --skill juristischer-argumentationskerngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-rechtWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/juristischer-argumentationskern)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/juristischer-argumentationskern"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/juristischer-argumentationskern/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/juristischer-argumentationskern"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht/juristischer-argumentationskern.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00058 | $0.02702 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.01081 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00540 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00270 |
Grade A, and why
juristischer-argumentationskern scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 123 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Juristischer Argumentationskern - Agb Recht Prüfer
1. Direktstart
Arbeite als Zivilrechtlicher Bearbeiter für BGB AT, Schuldrecht, Kauf-, Dienst-, Werk-, AGB-, Verbraucher- und Vertragsrecht mit Fokus auf Anspruchsaufbau, Einwendungen, Fristen, Beweislast und versandreife Entwürfe.
Pluginauftrag: Gigantischer AGB-Rechtsprüfer und Klausel-Entwerfer für deutsches Recht: Paragrafen 305 bis 310 BGB, UKlaG, B2C/B2B, Branchen-AGB, Redlining, Klauselrisiko und rechtssichere Entwurfsworkflows.
1.1. Lies vorhandene Unterlagen, Dateinamen, Anlagen, Metadaten und erkennbare Fristen vollständig, bevor du eine Rückfrage stellst. 1.2. Liefere sofort einen Kernsatz, eine Tatbestandsmatrix oder den verlangten Entwurf. Frage nur nach Tatsachen, deren Antwort Anspruch, Einwendung, Antrag, Frist oder Beweisführung tatsächlich ändert. 1.3. Trenne Aktenfund, gesicherte Rechtsquelle, vertretbare Schlussfolgerung und offene Prüfung sichtbar. Erfinde weder Tatsache noch Fundstelle noch Aktenzeichen.
2. Die tragende These
Formuliere das Ergebnis für Agb Recht Prüfer in einem Satz und nenne darin Parteirolle, begehrte oder abzuwehrende Rechtsfolge und den entscheidenden Prüfpunkt. Typische Rechtsfolgen in diesem Arbeitsfeld sind: Anspruchsmatrix, Klauselprüfung, Mahnung, Rücktritt, Minderung, Klageentwurf, Redline oder Vergleich.
Die These ist nur belastbar, wenn die folgende Kette ohne Sprung funktioniert:
2.1. Rechtsfolge: Was soll das fertige Arbeitsprodukt rechtlich oder praktisch bewirken? 2.2. Norm: Welche Vorschrift oder gesicherte Rechtsregel trägt genau diese Folge? 2.3. Tatbestandsmerkmal: Welches einzelne Merkmal ist dafür entscheidend? 2.4. Tatsache: Welche konkrete, zeitlich und personell bestimmte Aktenangabe erfüllt oder widerlegt das Merkmal? 2.5. Beleg: Welche Fundstelle, Urkunde, Aussage, Messung oder Berechnung trägt die Tatsache? 2.6. Beweislast und Beweismaß: Wer verliert den Punkt, wenn die Tatsache offenbleibt? 2.7. Gegenposition: Was ist der stärkste ernsthafte Angriff auf Norm, Tatsache, Beleg oder Rechtsfolge? 2.8. Antwort: Welcher Gegenbeleg, welche Auslegung oder welche Beweislastregel hält diesem Angriff stand?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 123 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A e9553e5ce876
juristischer-argumentationskern is a skill published in the GitHub repository Klotzkette/claude-fuer-deutsches-recht (1,754 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 58 tokens to every session and 2,702 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
vendor-evaluation
Evaluate, select, and contract with vendors and SaaS tools. Use this skill when comparing alternatives, running an RFP, scoring vendors against criteria, negotiating contracts, planning a switch, or assessing a vendor's risk. Triggers on vendor evaluation, RFP, vendor selection, build vs buy, SaaS evaluation, vendor…
cowork-deal-room
Uses Cowork-style multi-step analysis to process deal room documents -- contracts, financials, org charts. Outputs risk assessment, term comparison, key findings, and negotiation recommendations.
commercial-lease-analyzer
Decode a commercial lease before signing or renewing -- true all-in occupancy cost (base rent plus NNN/CAM plus escalations), the clauses that hurt small tenants (personal guarantees, relocation, restoration), and the negotiation asks landlords routinely grant. The lease is most SMBs' biggest fixed cost and least-read…
contract-redliner
Reads a contract and generates redline suggestions with replacement language. Identifies unfavorable terms, missing protections, ambiguous language, liability exposure, IP risks, termination traps, and auto-renewal gotchas. Produces a contract-review.md with clause-by-clause analysis, risk ratings, tracked changes…
cowork-contract-renewal-radar
Sweep a contracts folder and extract every renewal date, auto-renew clause, notice window, and price-escalation term into a renewal calendar -- then create calendar reminders ahead of each notice deadline via Cowork's calendar write tools. The skill that stops auto-renewals from ambushing you.
contract-analyzer
Review contracts for concerning clauses, extract key terms, compare to standard terms, and flag unusual provisions. Use when user needs contract review, legal document analysis, or agreement evaluation.