Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/gemini-extension)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/gemini-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/gemini-extension/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/gemini-extension"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase/gemini-extension.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
ai-architect-mcp-codebase scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "ai-architect-mcp-codebase",
"version": "0.11.1",
"description": "Codebase-intelligence MCP server and portable workflows for codebase understanding, impact analysis, and change-plan validation. Requires the binary from `cargo install ai-architect-mcp-codebase` on PATH.",
"mcpServers": {
"ai-architect": {
"command": "ai-architect-mcp-codebase",
"args": ["--profile", "core"]
}
}
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 12 lines scan A 6ca8c727112a
ai-architect-mcp-codebase is a plugin published in the GitHub repository cdeust/ai-architect-mcp-codebase (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other plugins, from other repositories
brooks-lint
AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and six analysis modes (PR review, architecture audit, tech debt, test quality, health dashboard, full-sweep auto-fix).
swe-workbench
Senior-engineer toolkit: principled design (Clean Arch, DDD, SOLID, TDD, patterns, observability, concurrency), security review, language expertise (Bash, C#, Dart, Go, Java, Kotlin, Python, Ruby, Rust, SQL, Swift, TypeScript), and pragmatic workflows.
python-clang-mcp
C/C++ code introspection via libclang — fills gaps that clangd-via-LSP cannot expose (macro expansion at use-site, record layout, predicate-based AST queries, bitfield audits, attribute audits, call-site argument patterns).
devMappouras-plugins marketplace
Plugin marketplace listing 1 plugin: local-code-review.
local-code-review
Local code review for uncommitted changes in .NET and Angular projects with build verification and optional unit test execution.
brooks-lint
AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books — decay risk diagnostics with book citations, severity labels, and six analysis modes (PR review, architecture audit, tech debt, test quality, health dashboard, full-sweep auto-fix).