Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fprochazka/claude-code-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"$schema": "https://anthropic.com/claude-code/plugin.schema.json",
"name": "code-review",
"version": "1.16.0",
"description": "Multi-agent branch code review — conventions, architecture, design craft, bugs, performance, security, release readiness, git history, and documentation reviewed in parallel",
"author": {
"name": "Filip Procházka",
"url": "https://github.com/fprochazka"
},
"license": "MIT",
"homepage": "https://github.com/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/tree/master/plugins/code-review",
"keywords": [
"code-review",
"multi-agent",
"conventions",
"security",
"architecture",
"design",
"performance"
],
"dependencies": [
"teamwork",
"prose",
"diagrams",
"glab",
{
"name": "glab-discussion",
"marketplace": "fprochazka-glab-discussion"
}
]
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 3 skills, 9 agents travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 443 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
- Skill full A 19 tokens
- Skill watch C 34 tokens
- Skill post C 33 tokens
- Agent review-release A 43 tokens
- Agent review-docs A 41 tokens
- Agent review-bugs A 39 tokens
- Agent review-code-design A 42 tokens
- Agent review-architecture A 40 tokens
- Agent review-git-history A 38 tokens
- Agent review-performance A 40 tokens
- Agent review-security A 35 tokens
- Agent review-conventions A 39 tokens
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed a1ec516a1a1a
- 25d ago Changed · +1 lines a819ab550fa2
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines bccbebf82983
- 1mo ago Changed bd8ab9272223
- 1mo ago Changed ef67e35e714d
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines 7c6b01d08d80
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines scan A 778f13c47800
code-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository fprochazka/claude-code-plugins (15 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other plugins, from other repositories
han-communication
Foundational communication plugin for the Han suite. Owns the canonical readability standard, the writing-voice profile, and the explanation standard for talking to a reader who will not implement the work, plus the readability-guidance skill that surfaces the first two into a calling skill's own context for in-voice…
pedantic-coder
Zero-tolerance code pedantry — naming precision, casing law, structural symmetry, import discipline, and the obsessive details that separate clean code from correct code.
ai-infra-auto-driven-skills
Agent-ready playbooks for LLM serving benchmarks, SGLang model Day-0 support, capacity planning, profiling, code review, incidents, PR-history dossiers, and SGLang PR/article explainer videos.
git-pr
Committing, PR creation and review triage, and dependency upgrades.
code-quality
OxLint, Biome, and Prettier configuration, linting skills, and pre-commit hooks for consistent code quality.
coderabbit
CodeRabbit integration for Claude Code - local code review and PR comment management.