watch

watch is a skill for Claude Code from fprochazka/claude-code-plugins. It costs 34 tokens per session (9,431 once invoked), scanned C, original, MIT.

A workflow that reviews a merge request, posts the findings, and waits for the author to address or answer every open issue before reviewing again. A merge request is a proposed code change, and the workflow uses its draft and review-ready states to control when another review starts.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to manage repeated review rounds until blockers and suggestions are fixed or explicitly rejected, with the ticket and merge request kept in matching work or review states.
Why use it?
It avoids repeatedly reviewing unfinished work and keeps the author and reviewer in a clear handoff cycle. It also revisits open discussion threads and checks new changes after the author updates the branch.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions subagents.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the code-review plugin — 3 skills, 9 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to manage repeated review rounds until blockers and suggestions are fixed or explicitly rejected, with the ticket and merge request kept in matching work or review states.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add fprochazka/claude-code-plugins
Claude Code
/plugin install code-review

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install code-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 3 skills, 9 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for watch

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for watch

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/fprochazka/claude-code-plugins/watch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 9,431 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan C 1 finding. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.09431
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.03772
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.01886
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00943

Measured 15d ago against content hash 69b41e39546a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade C, and why

watch scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Hidden instructionshighPrompt injection

Directives inside HTML comments, invisible characters or bidirectional overrides are read by the model and not by the person reviewing the file.

- Every body `post.md` writes ends with `<!-- code-review:post -->`. Replace that line, inline and summary alike, with your own signature, so later passes can recognize your own threads by an exact last-line match:
plugins/code-review/skills/watch/SKILL.md · 447 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 447 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Watch the MR Until the Review Is Settled

Run a full code review of the current branch's merge request, post it, hand the work back to the author, and then watch it through the watcher agent until every blocking finding and every suggestion has been addressed in code or refuted with a reply.

The handshake invariant. The ticket carries the ball, as teamwork:review-handshake defines it; Phase 0.4 loads that skill.

That is what paces this command. After posting a round of findings, hand the work back per teamwork:review-handshake; the next round runs only when the handshake reads ready-for-review again. This keeps the review out of work-in-progress instead of commenting on every half-finished push.

review → post → hand back (teamwork:review-handshake) → [wait]
   → the author hands over again
   → sync the local branch onto the author's new head
   → revisit every open thread, reply, resolve what is settled
   → review the delta, post new findings
   → anything still open? hand back, wait again
   → nothing open? leave it handed over and stop

This command is the reviewer side of an MR. It is the mirror image of /sdlc:mr-babysit, which is the author side. The distinction matters and is enforced below: this command never edits, commits, pushes, or rebases locally.

$ARGUMENTS

Stance — you are the reviewer, not the author

For the whole lifetime of this command, including every follow-up round:

  • Never change the code. No Edit, no Write into the repo, no git commit, no git push, no local git rebase, no git checkout of a different branch, no stash. If a finding has an obvious fix, describe it in the comment. Do not apply it.
  • Never resolve a thread the author opened, and never promise anything on the MR — teamwork:review-handshake.

Exactly two kinds of write to git are authorized (the MR draft flag and the ticket status are metadata, not code — see the autonomy grant below):

  1. The server-side rebase via glab mr rebase — Phase 1, once, never repeated.
  2. The guarded git reset --hard of the local sync procedure — after that rebase, and again at the start of every follow-up round. It fast-forwards the checkout onto the author's current head so re-reviews read fresh code. It never runs over a dirty tree or over local-only commits.

Read the full file on GitHub · 447 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 15d ago Changed · +16 lines 69b41e39546a
  2. 25d ago Changed · -2 lines · +6 tokens per session dcab51c8f15b
  3. 1mo ago First seen · 433 lines · 28 tokens per session scan C f9b961d564dc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

watch is a skill published in the GitHub repository fprochazka/claude-code-plugins (15 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 9,431 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (hidden instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoreview

Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.

openclaw/clawhub · 17 tokens

omh-code-review

This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).

rlaope/oh-my-hermes · 48 tokens

revdiff-plan

Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…

umputun/revdiff · 84 tokens

asplos-writing-style

Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills · 65 tokens

explore-unknowns

Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…

dzhng/skills · 162 tokens

re0-merge

Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…

LilMGenius/paperthin · 70 tokens