agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills. It costs 115 tokens per session (4,686 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A workflow for using parallel AI agents to implement changes, inspect the code for simplicity and security issues, document fixes, and repeat the checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it for features or fixes that touch many files and need implementation, auditing, testing, and repeated review.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that a large batch of code changes leaves behind bugs, unnecessary complexity, or gaps from the original requirements.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it for features or fixes that touch many files and need implementation, auditing, testing, and repeated review.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
About the project

OpenClaw Master Skills is a curated, regularly updated collection of skills that extends an AI personal assistant platform with capabilities such as research, browser automation, presentation creation, and prompt work. It is intended for people using OpenClaw or MyClaw.ai to give their agents additional tasks and workflows. The catalogue contains many skills and agents from this collection.

LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills · 2,141 stars · on GitHub · myclaw.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills --skill agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 115 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 4,686 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 11
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00115 $0.04686
Opus 5 $0.00057 $0.02343
Sonnet 5 $0.00023 $0.00937
Haiku 4.5 $0.00012 $0.00469

Measured 9d ago against content hash a9fb957baaf2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden/SKILL.md · 477 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Agent Teams Simplify & Harden

Install

npx skills add pskoett/pskoett-ai-skills/agent-teams-simplify-and-harden

A two-phase team loop that produces production-quality code: implement, then audit using simplify + harden passes, then fix audit findings, then re-audit, repeating until the codebase is solid or the loop cap is reached.

When to Use

  • Implementing multiple features from a spec or plan
  • Hardening a codebase after a batch of changes
  • Fixing a list of issues or gaps identified in a review
  • Any task touching 5+ files where quality gates matter

The Pattern

┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                  TEAM LEAD (you)                          │
│                                                           │
│  Phase 1: IMPLEMENT (+ document pass on fix rounds)       │
│  ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐                 │
│  │ impl-1   │ │ impl-2   │ │ impl-3   │  ...            │
│  │ (general │ │ (general │ │ (general │                 │
│  │ purpose) │ │ purpose) │ │ purpose) │                 │
│  └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘                 │
│       │             │            │                        │
│       ▼             ▼            ▼                        │
│  ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐                 │
│  │  Verify: compile + tests            │                 │
│  └─────────────────────────────────────┘                 │
│       │                                                   │
│  Phase 2: SIMPLIFY & HARDEN AUDIT                         │
│  ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐                 │
│  │ simplify │ │ harden   │ │ spec     │  ...            │
│  │ auditor  │ │ auditor  │ │ auditor  │                 │
│  │ (Explore)│ │ (Explore)│ │ (Explore)│                 │
│  └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘                 │
│       │             │            │                        │
│       ▼             ▼            ▼                        │
│  Exit conditions met?                                     │
│    YES → Produce summary. Ship it.                        │
│    NO  → back to Phase 1 with findings as tasks           │
│          (max 3 audit rounds)                             │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Read the full file on GitHub · 477 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 477 lines · 115 tokens per session scan A a9fb957baaf2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

agent-teams-simplify-and-harden is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills (2,141 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 115 tokens to every session and 4,686 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

autoplan

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when…

GCWing/BitFun · 152 tokens

redteam-code-audit-detail-pack

Domain routing and boundary guidance for authorized source code security review, including dangerous function tracing, data-flow analysis, logic flaw detection, and dependency review. Use when a task belongs to the code audit domain and needs scope, evidence, pivot, or exit criteria.

Netw0rkNoob/VulnClaw · 59 tokens

cocoreview

CocoReview — structured code review with six-severity findings vocabulary, progressive disclosure architecture, and universal anti-pattern baseline. Invoked via $review [file] [--complexity] [--security] [--architecture] [--language ].

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 57 tokens

review

Enter the Review phase of CocoBrew. Aggregates findings from Code Quality Advisor, CocoCupper intelligence, spec compliance check, and decision coverage gate. Produces review.md with decision points. Requires developer approval before $ship can proceed.

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 50 tokens

code-reviewer

Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.

RightNow-AI/openfang · 17 tokens

stage-coach

Consume CocoSentinel per-stage external coach requests and produce stage quality scores.

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 19 tokens