Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/harnessprotocol/harness-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/harnessprotocol/harness-kit/dependabot-sweep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/harnessprotocol/harness-kit/dependabot-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/harnessprotocol/harness-kit/dependabot-sweep/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/harnessprotocol/harness-kit/dependabot-sweep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/harnessprotocol/harness-kit/dependabot-sweep.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
dependabot-sweep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "dependabot-sweep",
"description": "End-to-end Dependabot remediation: fetch open alerts, fix per ecosystem, verify, and open/merge a PR",
"version": "0.1.1",
"category": "devops",
"tags": ["security", "dependabot", "dependencies", "ci-cd", "automation"],
"requires": {
"env": [
{
"name": "GH_TOKEN",
"description": "GitHub token used by the gh CLI to read Dependabot alerts, open PRs, watch CI, and merge",
"required": true,
"sensitive": true,
"when": "All dependabot-sweep operations require GitHub access"
}
]
}
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 149 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 19 lines scan A 49a533a610a4
dependabot-sweep is a plugin published in the GitHub repository harnessprotocol/harness-kit (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
llm-wiki
Build a shared Markdown knowledge base with local hybrid search and an optional evidence-linked workflow to capture task lessons, evaluate skill improvements, and apply or roll back tested changes.
privacy-guard
Keeps private infrastructure details out of public repositories. Ships the privacy-guard skill: session rules for what must never cross the public boundary, plus a per-repo pre-commit gate built on a gitignored local denylist and gitleaks. The denylist is never committed, so the hook is a no-op for external…
github-workflow
Git commit, PR creation, review, and merge skills following Conventional Commits.
coding
Opinionated Claude Code workflow skills: clear and unambiguous technical writing (write-clearly), iterative planning (replan), proof-based code review (review, review-staged, second-opinion), disciplined Conventional-Commit staging (gitplan, stage), finding the session that wrote an uncommitted change (find), and the…
software-factory
Lanes, tickets, and a human merge. Same skills as Cursor, Grok, and Codex.
agent-based-development
Full async multi-agent development workflow: Planning → Design → Dev → Security/Tech Review loop with file-based handoffs and release-branch Git model.