espalier-engineering marketplace

A plugin that learns the actual patterns in a codebase and turns them into rules, skills, agents, hooks, and a guided workflow. These are instructions that help an AI coding agent follow the project's conventions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to discover project conventions, encode them as reusable guidance, and keep generated code aligned with the codebase.
Why use it?
It reduces code that looks plausible but conflicts with the project's existing style and practices.

Plugin for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering
agentmods
npx agentmods add plugins/junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering/marketplace
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured Not applicable: nothing here is loaded into a session.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

espalier-engineering marketplace scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude-plugin/marketplace.json · 26 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "espalier-engineering",
  "owner": {
    "name": "Zayhan"
  },
  "description": "Marketplace publishing the Espalier Engineering plugin \u2014 auto-discovered, project-specific guardrails for AI coding agents",
  "version": "0.23.0",
  "plugins": [
    {
      "name": "espalier-engineering",
      "source": {
        "source": "github",
        "repo": "Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering"
      },
      "description": "Train your AI coders the way you'd train a vine \u2014 discover your codebase's actual patterns, then encode them as rules, skills, agents, hooks, and a guided pipeline so generated code lands inside your conventions on the first try, not the fifth",
      "version": "0.23.0",
      "author": {
        "name": "Zayhan"
      },
      "homepage": "https://github.com/Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering",
      "repository": "https://github.com/Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering",
      "license": "MIT"
    }
  ]
}
Contents

The plugins it lists here

This marketplace lists 1 plugin kept in the same repository. Each has its own page, its own measurements and its own install command.

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside marketplace.json in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 26 lines scan A 4d3dea3f821e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

espalier-engineering marketplace is a plugin published in the GitHub repository Junhanliu-dev/espalier-engineering (72 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.