Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kelp/agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kelp/agent-plugins/cross-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kelp/agent-plugins/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/kelp/agent-plugins/cross-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/kelp/agent-plugins/cross-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/kelp/agent-plugins/cross-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>Grade A, and why
cross-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
{
"name": "cross-review",
"description": "Native code review from Claude, Codex, and/or Grok. Call one harness or any set. Each callee uses its own reviewer. A warm process pool reuses app-server / grok agent / claude -p across reviews.",
"version": "0.10.1",
"author": {
"name": "Travis Cole"
},
"homepage": "https://github.com/kelp/agent-plugins",
"repository": "https://github.com/kelp/agent-plugins"
}
What it installs
The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill, 2 agents travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 163 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 6bd498d6c7a3
- 1mo ago First seen · 11 lines scan A 40b02e3d1a37
cross-review is a plugin published in the GitHub repository kelp/agent-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other plugins, from other repositories
code-review
Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Use for receiving feedback, requesting code-reviewer subagent reviews, or preventing false completion claims in pull requests.
handbook-code-review
Code review plugin with a standalone reviewer agent and two skill strategies: disposable subagents for one-shot reviews and persistent team members for iterative reviews.
sound
Code taste as installable rules. Probe a repo's stack, select only the rules its code shows a surface for (evidence-cited per rule), confirm, and scaffold a browsable .claude/sound/ rule map (surfaced by the sound:prime skill). Installed rules are user-owned; re-runs reconcile.
odin-code-advanced
Advanced ODIN workflows for complex code changes and technical audits.
odin-git
ODIN workflows for commits, branches, pull requests, review feedback, and issue tracking.
review
Code quality review tools for development teams.